Skip to content
personpersonCasandra VenturaCasandra VenturaMusician and entertainer known professionally as Cassie, and a former partner of Sean Combs.← All People
Witness

Casandra Ventura

Musician and entertainer known professionally as Cassie, and a former partner of Sean Combs.

4,822 lines·156 proceedings·134 mentions

About

Casandra Ventura testified for the prosecution on Day 6 and Day 7 about her relationship with Sean Combs and what she described as physical and psychological abuse, control over parts of her career and daily life, and sexual encounters called freak-offs. She described escorts, hotels, drugs, detailed preparation, recordings, and staff involvement, and said she continued participating because she feared making Combs angry. Ventura said Combs sometimes set up a FaceTime call to watch from another room and expected her to continue the encounter while he could see her.

Her direct testimony also addressed alleged assaults and injuries, threats involving recorded sexual material, the March 2016 InterContinental Hotel incident, drug dependency and treatment, and her allegation that Combs raped her in 2018. Photographs, messages, electronic-device material, recordings, and sealed video stills were used during the examination.

On Day 8 and Day 9, defense counsel cross-examined Ventura with messages, photographs, and recordings concerning affection, conflict, planning for freak-offs, shared drug use, secrecy, later contact, and the civil settlement. Ventura acknowledged that she sometimes helped prepare for encounters, used drugs with Combs, exchanged loving messages, and remained in contact after their breakup. She nevertheless disputed characterizations that reduced her participation to voluntary sexual preference, denied wanting the encounters recorded, and qualified counsel's descriptions of particular messages, dates, and motives.

On redirect, Ventura said periods when Combs was kind did not last and that his moods and demands affected her career and sense of self. She said she was initially open to trying freak-offs but later did not want them and felt unable to refuse because of concerns about her safety, career, and relationship. After further recross and redirect about videos, drug use, career issues, and settlement timing, she denied a financial stake and said she kept broken devices because she feared they contained explicit videos.

Trial Record (156)

Federal2025 Federal TrialMay 5, 2025 – Jul 2, 2025Called by prosecution

Casandra Ventura testified for the prosecution about alleged abuse and control in her relationship with Sean Combs and about sexual encounters involving escorts, drugs, hotels, recordings, and staff. Defense counsel used messages expressing affection, shared drug use, later contact, and her help arranging some encounters to challenge her account. Ventura said she later did not want the encounters and did not feel able to refuse.

Day 5

Day 6

ProceduralRule 615 Witness-Exclusion HearingMentioned

Summary

The court set a Rule 615 process for Ventura's husband, ordered advance notice for future exclusion requests, and directed counsel to seek a sidebar before the 2018 questioning.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectCasandra Ventura — DirectCasandra VenturaEmily A. Johnson2highlights644lines spoken

Summary

Ventura described alleged abuse, control, and freak-offs involving escorts, drugs, hotels, and Combs's staff; the court admitted multiple related exhibits.

Highlights (2)

Quote“I just didn't feel like I had much of a choice. Um, I didn't really know what no would be or what no could turn into.”— Casandra VenturaVentura explained why she said she continued participating in freak-offs despite not wanting to.Open in transcript →
Quote“the freak-offs became a job where there was no space to do anything else but to recover and just try to feel normal again.”— Casandra VenturaVentura connected the encounters to the effect she said they had on her ability to work on her music.Open in transcript →

Day 7

DirectCasandra Ventura — DirectCasandra VenturaEmily A. Johnson2highlights567lines spoken

Summary

Ventura testified about the InterContinental incident, escort arrangements, alleged threats involving recorded sexual material, alleged violence, and related exhibits.

Highlights (2)

Quote“He would mention them when he was upset about something. It was just a pretty common thing. One time I dated someone else and, like, that was the, like, that is what it was all about. I'm going to put out two embarrassing videos of you. He just wanted to hurt me.”— Casandra VenturaVentura described what she said were recurring threats to release recorded sexual material.Open in transcript →
Quote“Honestly, at that point, whatever was going to make him not be angry at me and threatening me I was willing to do. Yeah, I just didn't want to feel scared anymore and one thing he made me feel like I was good at.”— Casandra VenturaVentura explained why she said she participated in a freak-off after the flight from France.Open in transcript →

Day 8

CrossCasandra Ventura — CrossCasandra VenturaAnna M. Estevao2highlights456lines spoken

Summary

Ventura was cross-examined with admitted messages about her relationship with Combs and freak-offs; she qualified the defense's characterizations, denied wanting recordings, and described keeping the encounters secret.

Highlights (2)

Quote“No. There is a lot more to that.”— Casandra VenturaVentura resisted counsel's characterization that she told Combs she wanted freak-offs simply to make him happy.Open in transcript →
Quote“I didn't want them to be recorded at all.”— Casandra VenturaVentura rejected the suggestion that she wanted recordings placed on her own device so she could delete them.Open in transcript →

Day 9

Day 10

ProceduralTrial Evidentiary RulingsMentioned

Summary

The court made evidentiary rulings on proposed testimony from Dawn Richard, Kerry Morgan, and David James, excluding several statements while permitting others subject to foundation.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

sidebarRedirect Scope on Lawsuit ReasonsMentioned

Summary

The sidebar addressed the permissible scope of redirect after cross-examination challenged the witness's credibility and motives for communicating with and suing the defendant.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 11

Day 12

Day 13

Day 14

Day 15

Day 16

ProceduralMia Testimony Evidentiary RulingsMentioned

Summary

The court denied the motion to strike Dr. Hughes, set privacy measures for Mia's testimony, and ruled on proposed defense exhibits, including the scrapbook and text messages.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 17

CrossMia — CrossMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense cross-examined Mia with years of favorable social-media posts about Sean Combs; Mia said the posts presented a positive public image and did not reflect her private fear and misery.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossMia — CrossMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense used Mia's favorable posts and birthday gifts to challenge her account; Mia said they reflected public high points, workplace expectations, and an abusive relationship she found difficult to leave.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 18

CrossMia — CrossMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense used Mia's later affectionate messages and a video to challenge her account; Mia said fear, loyalty, and psychological confusion explained the communications, while the court limited portions of the impeachment effort.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossMia — Cross ResumesMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense challenged Mia's disclosure timeline, prior mediation, later communications, and lack of corroborating records; Mia described fear, control, shame, and difficulty disclosing, while the court repeatedly limited question form.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossMia — Cross ResumesMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense challenged Mia's disclosure timeline, corroboration, and employment account; Mia maintained she felt unable to leave, and the court barred further therapist-related questioning and instructed jurors to disregard related testimony.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 19

ProceduralGX A-905-A Redaction HearingMentioned

Summary

The court addressed proposed hearsay redactions, adjusted witness order for video-compilation revisions, and admitted a digital-device extract and stipulated bank records.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

ProceduralJane Testimony Privacy MeasuresMentioned

Summary

The court set privacy measures for Jane's testimony, preserved a video-compilation dispute, clarified two defense exhibits' admission, and granted same-day courtroom access for defense review.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 20

Day 21

Day 23

sidebarPrivilege and Video Testimony DisputeMentioned

Summary

Counsel raised concerns about potential privilege and the relevance of a witness's reaction to a video, while the prosecutor agreed to move on from the privilege-related inquiry.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 24

ProceduralMistrial and Evidentiary Motions RulingsMentioned

Summary

The court denied the mistrial and evidentiary motions, declined to recall Dr. Hughes, and received defense preservation requests concerning alleged false testimony, a juror, and later Rule 29 issues.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 25

Day 26

Day 27

Day 28

Day 29

Day 30

Day 31

Day 33

ProceduralDefense Case by StipulationMentioned

Summary

The defense presented sexual and affectionate messages and stipulations about earlier witness statements and report omissions, then rested; the government declined rebuttal, and closings were scheduled for Thursday.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 34

Day 35

Day 36

Day 37

Day 38

Day 39

VerdictVerdict Return and Jury DischargeMentioned

Summary

The jury unanimously acquitted Sean Combs of racketeering conspiracy and both sex-trafficking counts, while convicting him on two Mann Act transportation counts.

Mentioned in this proceeding.