Skip to content
personpersonCasandra VenturaCasandra VenturaMusician and entertainer known professionally as Cassie, and a former partner of Sean Combs.← All People
Witness

Casandra Ventura

Musician and entertainer known professionally as Cassie, and a former partner of Sean Combs.

4,808 lines·156 proceedings·134 mentions

About

Casandra Ventura gave extensive prosecution testimony over Days 6 through 9 about her relationship with Sean Combs. She described alleged physical and psychological abuse, increasing control over her career, appearance, communications, housing, and finances, and freak-offs involving escorts, drugs, hotels, and recorded sexual activity. She also identified sealed still images that she said depicted freak-offs and described alleged assaults, injuries, hotel stays, contacts with staff and security, and alleged threats involving recorded sexual material.

Defense cross-examination used messages, photographs, recordings, treatment-related questioning, drug use, a burner phone, and Ventura's continued contact with Combs after their 2018 breakup. Counsel questioned her account of the alleged 2018 rape and presented later affectionate and reflective messages. Ventura acknowledged some matters, including shared drug use and periods of opiate dependence, while qualifying defense characterizations of particular messages, timing, and motives.

On redirect, Ventura said that kind and loving periods in the relationship did not last and that freak-off demands affected her career and self-worth. She said she was initially open to trying freak-offs but later did not want them or feel able to refuse, citing safety, career, and relationship concerns. She reaffirmed her account of being hit and pursued from a March 2016 InterContinental Hotel freak-off, said she had no doubt Combs raped her in August 2018, and said she expected no payment for testifying.

During deliberations, the court resolved the jury's request for excerpts of Ventura's testimony, including the permitted scope of testimony about the InterContinental Hotel incident and limited testimony about her 2024 Instagram post.

Key Points

Trial Record (156)

Trial 12025 Federal TrialMay 5, 2025 – Jul 2, 2025Called by prosecution

Casandra Ventura testified for the prosecution about her relationship with Sean Combs, alleged abuse and control, and freak-offs involving escorts, drugs, hotels, and recorded sexual activity. Cross-examination tested her account through messages, later contact, drug use, and questions about specific allegations; on redirect, she reaffirmed that she later did not want freak-offs or feel able to refuse.

Day 5

Day 6

ProceduralRule 615 Witness-Exclusion HearingMentioned

Summary

The court set a Rule 615 process for Ventura's husband, ordered advance notice for future exclusion requests, and directed counsel to seek a sidebar before the 2018 questioning.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectCasandra Ventura — DirectCasandra VenturaEmily A. Johnson1highlight644lines spoken

Summary

Ventura described alleged abuse, control, and freak-offs involving escorts, drugs, hotels, and Combs's staff; the court admitted multiple related exhibits.

Highlights (1)

Quote“I just didn't feel like I had much of a choice. Um, I didn't really know what no would be or what no could turn into.”— Casandra VenturaVentura explained why she said she continued participating in freak-offs despite not wanting to.Open in transcript →

Day 7

Day 8

CrossCasandra Ventura — CrossCasandra VenturaAnna M. Estevao1highlight452lines spoken

Summary

Ventura was cross-examined with admitted messages about her relationship with Combs and freak-offs; she qualified the defense's characterizations, denied wanting recordings, and described keeping the encounters secret.

Highlights (1)

Quote“I didn't want them to be recorded at all.”— Casandra VenturaVentura rejected the suggestion that she wanted recordings placed on her own device so she could delete them.Open in transcript →

Day 9

CrossCasandra Ventura — CrossCasandra VenturaAnna M. Estevao1highlight565lines spoken

Summary

Defense cross-examined Casandra Ventura with messages and recordings about the relationship, alleged 2018 rape chronology, later contact with Mr. Combs, and exhibit procedures.

Highlights (1)

Quote“There is no ceasing of all contact, but it was over when I said it was over, yeah.”— Casandra VenturaVentura distinguished continued communication from her view that the relationship had ended.Open in transcript →

Day 10

ProceduralPretrial Evidentiary RulingsMentioned

Summary

The court made evidentiary rulings on proposed testimony from Dawn Richard, Kerry Morgan, and David James, excluding several statements while permitting others subject to foundation.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

sidebarRedirect Scope on Lawsuit ReasonsMentioned

Summary

The sidebar addressed the permissible scope of redirect after cross-examination challenged the witness's credibility and motives for communicating with and suing the defendant.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 11

Day 12

Day 13

Day 14

Day 15

Day 16

ProceduralMia Testimony Evidentiary RulingsMentioned

Summary

The court denied the motion to strike Dr. Hughes, set privacy measures for Mia's testimony, and ruled on proposed defense exhibits, including the scrapbook and text messages.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 17

CrossMia — CrossMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense cross-examined Mia with years of favorable social-media posts about Sean Combs; Mia said the posts presented a positive public image and did not reflect her private fear and misery.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossMia — CrossMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense used Mia's favorable posts and birthday gifts to challenge her account; Mia said they reflected public high points, workplace expectations, and an abusive relationship she found difficult to leave.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 18

CrossMia — CrossMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense used Mia's later affectionate messages and a video to challenge her account; Mia said fear, loyalty, and psychological confusion explained the communications, while the court limited portions of the impeachment effort.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossMia — Cross ResumesMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense challenged Mia's disclosure timeline, prior mediation, later communications, and lack of corroborating records; Mia described fear, control, shame, and difficulty disclosing, while the court repeatedly limited question form.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossMia — Cross ResumesMiaBrian SteelMentioned

Summary

Defense challenged Mia's disclosure timeline, corroboration, and employment account; Mia maintained she felt unable to leave, and the court barred further therapist-related questioning and instructed jurors to disregard related testimony.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 19

ProceduralGX A-905-A Redaction HearingMentioned

Summary

The court addressed proposed hearsay redactions, adjusted witness order for video-compilation revisions, and admitted a digital-device extract and stipulated bank records.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

ProceduralJane Testimony Privacy MeasuresMentioned

Summary

The court set privacy measures for Jane's testimony, preserved a video-compilation dispute, clarified two defense exhibits' admission, and granted same-day courtroom access for defense review.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 20

Day 21

Day 23

sidebarPrivilege and Video Testimony DisputeMentioned

Summary

Counsel raised concerns about potential privilege and the relevance of a witness's reaction to a video, while the prosecutor agreed to move on from the privilege-related inquiry.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 24

ProceduralMistrial and Evidentiary Motions RulingsMentioned

Summary

The court denied the mistrial and evidentiary motions, declined to recall Dr. Hughes, and received defense preservation requests concerning alleged false testimony, a juror, and later Rule 29 issues.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 25

Day 26

Day 27

Day 28

Day 29

Day 30

Day 31

Day 33

Day 34

Day 35

Day 36

Day 37

Day 38

Day 39

VerdictVerdict Return and Jury DischargeMentioned

Summary

The jury unanimously acquitted Sean Combs of racketeering conspiracy and both sex-trafficking counts, while convicting him on two Mann Act transportation counts.

Mentioned in this proceeding.