Skip to content
evidenceevidencephysicalphotographvideoaudiodigitaldocumentdemonstrativetestimonystipulationother2025 Federal TrialEvidenceExhibits and other materials discussed in the 2025 federal trial of Sean Combs.

Physical Evidence (26)

Government Exhibit 1D-151 — Government Exhibit 1D-151 was a black fanny pack containing $9,000 recovered during the hotel-room search. On cross-examination, questioning addressed whether the cash could be evidence of a crime.
2 mentions
1A-110; 10A-101-A-1 — Government Exhibits 1A-110 and 10A-101-A-1 were admitted during Day 27 testimony concerning items recovered from the Mapleton residence. The paired exhibits were described as stipulated laboratory-testing exhibits involving yellow envelopes and a bag recovered from the master-bedroom safe.
1 mention
1A-111; 10A-102-A-1 — Government Exhibits 1A-111 and 10A-102-A-1 were admitted during Day 27 testimony concerning items recovered from the Mapleton residence. The paired exhibits were described as stipulated laboratory-testing exhibits involving yellow envelopes and a bag recovered from the master-bedroom safe.
1 mention
cash that he brought Mr. Combs to these wild king nights — Cash brought to wild king nights was discussed during Day 31 questioning limited to Brendan Paul's personal knowledge and lack of knowledge about its purpose.
1 mention
evidence seized from one of Mr. Combs' residences — Physical evidence seized from a residence was addressed during Day 11 discussion of how the government would display such evidence to the jury.
1 mention
firearms and ammunition — Andre LaMon testified that the firearms and ammunition he discussed were recovered from the security office, not from the children's bedrooms or elsewhere in the house.
1 mention
firearms found in the security room — Firearms found in the security room were the subject of a Day 27 procedural discussion about the witness's knowledge of their original placement. The court permitted testimony about firearms LaMon found while limiting it to matters within his personal knowledge.
1 mention
Glass bottle containing gasoline — A glass bottle contained a liquid that Investigator Jimenez testified smelled like gasoline. He concluded that the bottle had been used for a Molotov cocktail.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1A-116 — Government Exhibit 1A-116 was admitted during Day 27 testimony identifying firearms, magazines, and ammunition recovered from the security room.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-115 — Government Exhibit 1B-115 was a .45-caliber handgun recovered from a red suitcase in the guest-house guard area. Testimony also described an inserted magazine, nine rounds, and additional ammunition recovered there.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-117 — Government Exhibit 1B-117 was a box containing 41 rounds of .45-caliber ammunition found in the guest-house guard area.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-118 and 1B-116 — Government Exhibits 1B-118 and 1B-116 were a magazine and nine .45-caliber rounds. The ammunition was inside the magazine, and the magazine was inserted into the firearm.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-120 and 1B-121 — Government Exhibits 1B-120 and 1B-121 were two AR-15 upper receivers identified as items shown in a photograph. Testimony linked the components to items found in room R during the search.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-122 and 1B-123 — Government Exhibits 1B-122 and 1B-123 are two AR-15 lower receivers identified during Gerard Gannon's Day 11 direct testimony as items recovered in room R during the search. The court admitted both exhibits without objection.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-124 through 1B-127 — Government Exhibits 1B-124 through 1B-127 consist of 10-round and 30-round magazines and the ammunition removed from them. Gannon identified the magazines as those found at 2 Star and described the ammunition as having been in those magazines.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-142 — Government Exhibit 1B-142 consists of red heels identified as the heels depicted in a photograph of a master closet at 2 Star. The court admitted the exhibit on Day 12 without objection.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-147 and 1B-148 — Government Exhibits 1B-147 and 1B-148 are a pouch and a plastic bag recovered from a wooden box labeled Puffy in the master bathroom. A stipulation stated that the pouch's capsules tested for psilocybin and that the bag's purple rock-like material tested positive for MDMA.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-151 and 1B-152 — Government Exhibits 1B-151 and 1B-152 consist of 25 bottles of baby oil and 31 bottles of Astroglide recovered from a second-floor closet at 2 Star. Gannon testified that these were not all of the baby oil and Astroglide found there.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1D-150 — Government Exhibit 1D-150 contains pink solid material in an orange prescription bottle found in the bedroom of Park Hyatt hotel room 2115. A stipulation stated that the material tested positive for ketamine, and one bag of the material tested positive for both MDMA and ketamine.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-100 — Government Exhibit B-100 is an older white MacBook Pro identified as belonging to Cassie Ventura. Although it displayed a user-setup screen, an extraction from its removed hard drive recovered data that had not been wiped or overwritten by the factory-reset setting.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-300 — Government Exhibit B-300 is a MacBook Pro whose hard drive was removed for extraction after the laptop did not complete its boot process. Croft testified that bad sectors prevented recovery of some data, while a majority of the drive's contents were recovered.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B400 — Government Exhibit B400 is one of three iPhones attributed to Casandra Ventura that Enrique Santos identified as devices he extracted. Santos testified that he confirmed the phones against his case paperwork and had initialed them for recognition in court.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B500 — Government Exhibit B500 is one of three iPhones attributed to Casandra Ventura that Enrique Santos identified as devices he extracted. Santos testified that he confirmed the phones against his case paperwork and had initialed them for recognition in court.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B600 — Government Exhibit B600 is one of three iPhones attributed to Casandra Ventura that Enrique Santos identified as devices he extracted. Santos testified that he confirmed the phones against his case paperwork and had initialed them for recognition in court.
1 mention
Porsche-fire DNA evidence — During closing argument, defense counsel described the Porsche-fire DNA as a partial sample consistent with female DNA material on the glass bottle and argued that questions about the evidence remained unresolved.
1 mention
the glove that was found in the back of the car — A glove found in the back of the car was not collected because Investigator Jimenez considered it irrelevant and the owner said it belonged to him.
1 mention

Photographs (102)

Defense Exhibit 1799 — Defense Exhibit 1799 was excluded after the court found the proposed photographs irrelevant and cumulative. The court permitted questioning based on testimony about the underlying subject.
2 mentions
Defense Exhibit 406 — Defense Exhibit 406 was a message to Mr. Combs containing a photograph identified as showing Ms. Porter and her friend. The court admitted the exhibit, including the message preceding the photograph.
2 mentions
Defense Exhibit 739 — Defense Exhibit 739 was a photograph identified as depicting Rihanna, Ryan Leslie, and Cassie. The court admitted it during Mylah Morales's Day 13 cross-examination.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 2A-202 — Government Exhibit 2A-202 was a photograph identified by witnesses as depicting D-Roc. It was displayed during direct testimony on Days 11 and 15.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 8C-101 — Government Exhibit 8C-101 depicted the front gate and wall of the residence at 8925 Hollywood Hills Road. The court admitted the photograph on Day 15, and it was later compared with a photograph from a different angle.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 8C-102 — Government Exhibit 8C-102 depicted the front door of Scott Mescudi's former house, which he said he drove to after receiving a call from Ms. Clark. The court admitted the photograph on Day 13.
2 mentions
1193 — Exhibit 1193 was a photograph Ms. Ventura sent in a text exchange that also discussed a dance class and bruising. Defense counsel said the photograph would be shown to Ms. Ventura during cross-examination but would not be offered into evidence.
1 mention
1A-200; 1A-201; 1A-202; 1A-203; 1A-236; 1A-245; 1A-246; 1A-247 — Government Exhibits 1A-200, 1A-201, 1A-202, 1A-203, 1A-236, 1A-245, 1A-246, and 1A-247 were photographs associated with firearms, magazines, and ammunition in the security room. LaMon identified six firearms and testified that one rifle appeared to have had its serial number removed.
1 mention
1A101 — Exhibit 1A101 was displayed during Andre LaMon's Day 27 cross-examination to orient questioning about a dedicated security room.
1 mention
1A203 — Exhibit 1A203 depicted a safe that LaMon said appeared to have features of a gun safe. He testified that the photograph did not show whether the safe had been unlocked already or manipulated to unlock it.
1 mention
3Q-105 and B-105 — Exhibits 3Q-105 and B-105 were proposed photographs considered under Rule 403 on Day 4. The court excluded 3Q-105 and declined to exclude B-105.
1 mention
3R-101–3R-118 — Government Exhibits 3R-101 through 3R-118 were photographs Jane identified in testimony concerning a cash delivery and damaged doors.
1 mention
3T-109 — Government Exhibit 3T-109 was a photograph Mia said she took of Casandra Ventura eating a hot dog at the premiere of The Perfect Match. The court admitted the photograph during Mia's direct testimony.
1 mention
406 — Exhibit 406 was a photograph discussed during a Day 12 procedural hearing. The court said it was within bounds if connected with admitted testimony and later said it would review the exhibit more closely.
1 mention
B-105 — B-105 was a photograph showing victim 1 with another witness in 2005, when victim 1 was 19. The government said it provided context about their friendship shortly after she met the defendant and before she signed with his record label.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1417A — Defense Exhibit 1417A was a redacted exhibit containing approved photographs and limited messages concerning a hotel-room layout. The court excluded messages offered to prove that Ms. Ventura planned the event, while permitting specified later messages and photographs.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1727 — Defense Exhibit 1727 was an unredacted photograph previously provided to jurors in a binder during Mia's testimony. On Day 36, the court permitted the defense to use an enlarged poster-board version during closing while the name on the display remained redacted.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1847 — Defense Exhibit 1847 was a photograph that Deonte Nash identified as showing Cassie on New Year's Eve 2016/2017 in Las Vegas. The court admitted the exhibit without objection.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1848 — Defense Exhibit 1848 was a photograph that Deonte Nash identified as showing Puff and Cassie on New Year's Eve 2016/2017. The court admitted the exhibit without objection.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 303 — Defense Exhibit 303 was a defense photograph admitted during Gerard Gannon's cross-examination on Day 12.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 304 — Defense Exhibit 304 was a sealed photograph that Gerard Gannon did not recognize. Counsel elected to address authentication later rather than admit it through him.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 312 — Defense Exhibit 312 was a defense photograph admitted during Gerard Gannon's cross-examination on Day 12. The examination included testimony about photographing and sketching a property during a search.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 313 — Defense Exhibit 313 was a defense photograph admitted during Gerard Gannon's cross-examination on Day 12.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3290 — Defense Exhibit 3290 was a photograph Jane said she took on her phone of herself and Mr. Combs on the night of her birthday. The court admitted it under seal.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 623 — Defense Exhibit 623 was a photograph Mylah Morales recognized but could not place. She said she believed she had done the makeup shown in the photograph, and the court admitted it without objection.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 628 — Defense Exhibit 628 was a photograph referenced during Capricorn Clark's cross-examination, which addressed support for Ms. Ventura's music career.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 641 — Defense Exhibit 641 was a photograph the court excluded during Scott Mescudi's Day 13 redirect.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 647 — Defense Exhibit 647 showed a music-video shoot identified by Mylah Morales as the black-and-yellow video with Wiz Khalifa. The court admitted the photograph during her Day 13 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 648 — Defense Exhibit 648 was identified as a photograph from the same music-video shoot as Exhibit 647. The court admitted it during Mylah Morales's Day 13 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 652 — Defense Exhibit 652 was album art for Ms. Ventura's song "Love a Loser," which the defense said she designed with Ms. Bongolan to promote the song. The court excluded the exhibit under Rule 403 but allowed questioning of the witness about the project.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 655 — Defense Exhibit 655 was identified as a photograph from the same music-video shoot discussed during Mylah Morales's cross-examination. The court admitted the photograph on Day 13.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 656 and 657 — Defense Exhibits 656 and 657 were photographs identified as coming from the same video shoot. The court admitted both photographs during Mylah Morales's Day 13 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 743 — Defense Exhibit 743 was a photograph identified as from a Blank magazine photo shoot. The court admitted it during Mylah Morales's Day 13 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 744 — Defense Exhibit 744 was a defense photograph to which the court overruled an objection on Day 13.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 744 and 745 — Defense Exhibits 744 and 745 were photographs recognized as coming from the same photo shoot. The court admitted both photographs during Mylah Morales's Day 13 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 745 — Defense Exhibit 745 was a defense photograph to which the court overruled an objection on Day 13.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 746 — Defense Exhibit 746 was a photograph the court excluded during Scott Mescudi's Day 13 redirect.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 852 — Defense Exhibit 852 was a photograph taken on the day of the fire that Lance Jimenez identified as showing a second Porsche. The court admitted it during his Day 15 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 853 — Defense Exhibit 853 was another photograph taken on the day of the fire and showed what Lance Jimenez identified as a glove in a rear passenger seat. The court admitted it during his Day 15 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibits 1799-1 through 1799-25 — Defense Exhibits 1799-1 through 1799-25 were proposed photographs of Mia with friends and family. During Mia's cross-examination on Day 18, the court excluded the photographs absent a further showing.
1 mention
E-119; E-120; E-122; E-123 — Government Exhibits E-119, E-120, E-122, and E-123 were photographs shown to Ananya Sankar during cross-examination after she said they were not included in her chart. She testified that she had not seen the photographs before.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 10A-105-A1 — Government Exhibit 10A-105-A1 depicts a pink powder and prescription bottle from room 2115 at the Park Hyatt hotel. The stipulation stated that the pictured pink material tested positive for ketamine and that related material in the same bottle tested positive for MDMA and ketamine.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-103 — Government Exhibit 1B-103 is a photograph discussed during cross-examination about search documentation. The testimony acknowledged that some relevant photographs were taken after the search or did not show the original placement of items.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-200 through 202, 1B-204 through 208, 1B-210, 1B-212, 1B-215, 1B-217 through 219, 1B-221, 1B-222, 1B-225 through 228, 1B-230 through 242, 1B-244, 1B-247, 1B-249 through 252, 1B-254 through 258, 1B-261, 1B-263, and 1B-265 — The listed Government Exhibits 1B-200 through 1B-265 are photographs of items located or seized during the search of 2 Star Island. Gerard Gannon testified that they fairly and accurately represented items he saw and seized there.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-222 — Government Exhibit 1B-222 was discussed in questioning about a closet photograph. The testimony stated that agents arranged items for the photograph and did not document their exact original order.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1C109 — Government Exhibit 1C109 is a photograph of Brendan Paul, Kristina, and Sean Combs boarding a private jet for a vacation to the Bahamas. Brendan Paul identified the people and trip during his Day 31 testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-201 — Government Exhibit 2A-201 is a photograph that David James identified as depicting Roger Bonds during Day 11 testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-201 and 2A-406 — Government Exhibits 2A-201 and 2A-406 were displayed side by side during David James's testimony. James identified Roger Bonds on the left and Capricorn Clark on the right.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-301 — Government Exhibit 2A-301 is a photograph that Deonte Nash identified as Kristina Khorram during Day 15 testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-305 — Government Exhibit 2A-305 is a photograph that Deonte Nash identified as Toni Bias Fletcher during Day 15 testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-307 — Government Exhibit 2A-307 is a photograph of David James. James identified it as a fair and accurate depiction of himself, and the court admitted it during his Day 10 direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-308 — Government Exhibit 2A-308 is a photograph of George Kaplan. Kaplan identified himself in the photograph, and the court admitted it during his Day 12 direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-310 — Government Exhibit 2A-310 is a photograph of Ezequiel Leal. George Kaplan identified Leal in the photograph, and the court admitted it during Day 12 testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-311 — Government Exhibit 2A-311 was admitted during Kerry Morgan's Day 10 direct testimony concerning Morgan's account of an alleged 2018 assault and a later $30,000 payment.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-312 — Government Exhibit 2A-312 is a photograph of Elie Maroun. George Kaplan identified Maroun in the photograph during Day 12 testimony, and the court admitted it.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-313 — Jane identified Government Exhibit 2A-313 as a photograph of Sean Combs's assistant Brendan. The court admitted it during her testimony about assistants Combs called when he ran out of drugs in hotel rooms.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-314 — Government Exhibit 2A-314 is a photograph of Jonathan, whom Jane said she knew through Sean Combs as Sean's assistant. The court admitted the photograph during Jane's Day 23 direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-319 — Government Exhibit 2A-319 is a photograph that Dawn Richard identified as depicting Harve Pierre during her Day 10 direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-404 — Government Exhibit 2A-404 is a photograph that Regina Ventura said she recognized during direct testimony about an April 2012 trip to Los Angeles.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-405 — Government Exhibit 2A-405 is a photograph David James identified as Chef Jordan, whom he described as Sean Combs's personal chef for about a year and a half while he was there. The court admitted the photograph on Day 10.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-406 — Government Exhibit 2A-406 is a photograph David James identified as Capricorn Clark, whom he described as director of marketing when he was an assistant. The court admitted the photograph on Day 10.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-503 — Government Exhibit 2A-503 is a photograph of Kerry Morgan, whom Casandra Ventura identified as her best friend of about 17 years. The court admitted the photograph during Ventura's Day 7 direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-504 — Government Exhibit 2A-504 is a photograph Deonte Nash identified as a glamour shot of himself, rather than an accurate depiction of how he looked during part of his work as a stylist for Sean Combs.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-507 — Government Exhibit 2A-507 is a photograph Dawn Richard identified as depicting One Stop, whom she said used to deliver drugs to the studio. The court admitted the photograph on Day 10.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-603 — Government Exhibit 2A-603 is a photograph admitted during Jane's Day 22 direct testimony after discussion of an event Jane estimated occurred in 2023.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-610 — Government Exhibit 2A-610 is a photograph admitted during Jane's Day 22 direct testimony in discussion of an entertainer invited to a hotel room in approximately 2023.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-614 — Government Exhibit 2A-614 is a photograph Jane identified as Don, the entertainer she said she met in a hotel suite in May 2021. The court admitted the photograph on Day 21.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-627 — Government Exhibit 2A-627 is a photograph Casandra Ventura identified as depicting the first escort with whom she had a freak-off encounter. Ventura placed that first encounter in a bedroom at a rented Los Angeles home, and the court admitted the photograph on Day 6.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2A-635 — Government Exhibit 2A-635 is a photograph admitted during Jane's Day 22 direct testimony about arranging entertainers' travel, communications, and payments.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2B-101 — Government Exhibit 2B-101 is a photograph Dawn Richard identified as Sean Combs's Los Angeles home, where she testified a 2009 incident occurred.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2B-103 and 2B-104 — Government Exhibits 2B-103 and 2B-104 are photographs of the property at 200 South Mapleton Drive in Los Angeles, identified as fair and accurate representations from the day of the search. The court admitted both photographs on Day 27.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2B-105, 2B-106, and 1B-102 through 1B-105 — Government Exhibits 2B-105, 2B-106, and 1B-102 through 1B-105 are photographs identified as fair and accurate depictions of the 2 Star Island property on the day of the search. The court admitted the photographs on Day 11.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2B-107 — Government Exhibit 2B-107 is a photograph displayed during Regina Ventura's testimony after she described an argument outside Casandra Ventura's apartment building on the day Casandra said her phone was stolen.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2B-111 — Government Exhibit 2B-111 is a photograph Capricorn Clark identified as depicting the Bad Boy Worldwide and Sean John offices. The court admitted the photograph on Day 14.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2B-112 — Government Exhibit 2B-112 is a photograph Capricorn Clark identified as depicting the Bad Boy Worldwide building. The court admitted the photograph on Day 14.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2B-124 and 2B-125 — Government Exhibits 2B-124 and 2B-125 are photographs identified as fair and accurate depictions of the InterContinental Hotel in Century City as it existed in March 2016. The court admitted the photographs on Day 5.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2B-133 — Government Exhibit 2B-133 is a photograph of the Park Hyatt entrance in Manhattan, identified as a fair and accurate depiction of the hotel. The court admitted the photograph on Day 9.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3F-101, 3F-102, 3F-103, 3F-104, 3F-105, 3F-108 — Government Exhibits 3F-101 through 3F-108 were photographs Mescudi identified as depicting his car after it was damaged. The court admitted the photographs during his Day 13 direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3Q-106 through 3Q-115 — Government Exhibits 3Q-106 through 3Q-115 are photographs of Casandra Ventura in December 2011 that Regina Ventura said she took with a Kodak digital camera. Regina Ventura testified that she photographed Casandra because she was bruised, and the court admitted seven of the photographs.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3Q-107 — Government Exhibit 3Q-107 is a photograph Casandra Ventura said she took of the inside of her Harold Way front door in 2018. Ventura identified Harold Way as the last place she lived before breaking up with Sean, and the court admitted the photograph on Day 7.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3Q-109 — Government Exhibit 3Q-109 is a photograph identified during Casandra Ventura's Day 7 direct testimony. The government paired it with Ventura's account of alleged assaults, visible injuries, and efforts to conceal injuries.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3S-101 and 3S-101A — Government Exhibits 3S-101 and 3S-101A are photographs Bryana Bongolan identified as pictures of her back taken by her former girlfriend. She testified that they fairly and accurately depicted her back, and the court admitted them on Day 20.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3S-102 — Government Exhibit 3S-102 is a photograph Bryana Bongolan said she took of a bruise on the back of her leg on the same day. She testified that it fairly and accurately depicted her leg, and the court admitted it on Day 20.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3S-102A — Government Exhibit 3S-102A is another photograph of Bryana Bongolan's leg that she said showed accompanying data and came from the same time as the earlier photograph. She testified that it fairly and accurately depicted her leg, and the court admitted it on Day 20.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3S-104 — Government Exhibit 3S-104 is a photograph Bryana Bongolan identified as Casandra Ventura's balcony. She testified that it fairly and accurately depicted the balcony, and the court admitted it on Day 20.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3S-106 — Government Exhibit 3S-106 is a photograph Bryana Bongolan said she took while shopping with Casandra Ventura at a place called Church. She testified that it fairly and accurately depicted the two of them on that shopping trip, and the court admitted it on Day 20.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3S102A — Government Exhibit 3S102A was displayed during Bryana Bongolan's cross-examination while counsel questioned her about injury photographs and the metadata on her Apple iPhone 7. The questioning examined whether the displayed metadata date matched the asserted balcony-incident date.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3T109 — Government Exhibit 3T109 is a photograph of Casandra Ventura that was displayed during Mia's Day 18 cross-examination. Mia identified a bruise on Ventura's arm, and defense counsel asked her to locate it in an enlarged view.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 8C-103 through 141 — Government Exhibits 8C-103 through 8C-141 are scene photographs that Lance Jimenez said his partner took on January 9, 2012. He testified that they fairly and accurately depicted what he observed that day, and the court admitted them on Day 15.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 8C-116 — Government Exhibit 8C-116 is a photograph of the inside of a Porsche that shows a glass bottle. During Day 15 cross-examination, Lance Jimenez testified that he submitted the bottle for DNA testing.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 9M-105 — Government Exhibit 9M-105 is a photograph Dawn Richard identified as depicting the members of Diddy Dirty Money. The court admitted the photograph during her Day 9 direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 9P-102 — Government Exhibit 9P-102 is a photograph Dawn Richard identified as showing her and Casandra Ventura together at the Central Park festival in New York. The court admitted it during her Day 10 direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-247-A — Government Exhibit B-247-A is a photograph identified as depicting an injury to Casandra Ventura's eyebrow during her Day 7 direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-606 and B-607 — Government Exhibits B-606 and B-607 are photographs Casandra Ventura said she took after leaving the InterContinental Hotel. Ventura testified that the images showed a black eye she covered with sunglasses and a swollen lip.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-619 and related sealed exhibits — Government Exhibit B-619 and related sealed exhibits are sealed still images addressed during Casandra Ventura's Day 7 direct testimony. The court approved a procedure using hard copies for the court and defendant and screens limited to the jury and witness.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-266 — Government Exhibit E-266 is a photograph associated with testimony about a cash delivery and damaged doors. Jane identified photographs connected with the cash delivery and door damage during her Day 23 direct testimony.
1 mention
photo with your neck brace — The photograph showed Bryana Bongolan wearing a neck brace. She testified that she wore it because her neck hurt and that she wore it on occasions other than when the photograph was taken.
1 mention
photograph of firearms laid out in the security office — The photograph showed firearms laid out in a security office. During Day 27 procedural discussion, the government sought to explain that an earlier security team may have made firearms safe, while acknowledging that Special Agent LaMon did not know their original placement.
1 mention
photograph of Mia — The photograph depicted the witness testifying under the pseudonym Mia. The court approved turning off public and overflow screens while the jury, witness, and court viewed it.
1 mention
sealed Exhibit 2A-404 — Sealed Exhibit 2A-404 is a sealed photograph displayed during Deonte Nash's Day 15 direct testimony as questioning turned to occasions on which he said he witnessed violence involving Sean Combs and Casandra Ventura.
1 mention
six still images — The six still images were anticipated for a witness's direct examination and were described during a Day 6 access discussion as sexually explicit or involving nudity. The court deferred the anticipated presentation so the parties could further address proposed restrictions on public viewing.
1 mention
two pictures — The two pictures were identified by defense counsel as exhibits the defense intended to introduce during a Day 16 procedural discussion. The government stated it had no objection and anticipated that the witness could authenticate them.
1 mention

Video Evidence (54)

Defense Exhibit 1750 — Defense Exhibit 1750 was a short happy-birthday video clip involving Mia. The court initially precluded it, finding it minimally probative and cumulative and citing noncompliance with the exhibit-disclosure order; it was later admitted for limited use.
3 mentions
InterContinental video — The InterContinental video depicts the March 5, 2016 hotel incident involving Cassie. Defense counsel described the footage as showing domestic violence connected to jealousy and a phone, while the government argued it showed violence used to control Cassie during an ongoing commercial-sex encounter.
3 mentions
Government Exhibit 10c 114 — Government Exhibit 10C-114 is a compilation intended to present a sequence of surveillance footage. On Day 19, the court permitted demonstrative use and deferred an admission decision until testimony developed the record about the compilation, including camera changes, timestamps, and motion-sensor gaps.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 10C-103 — Government Exhibit 10C-103 was surveillance footage that Eddy Garcia said accurately depicted footage he observed when he arrived for his March 5, 2016 shift. The video was played from 20 to 36 seconds during his direct examination.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit E-272 — Government Exhibit E-272 is a video used while Jane testified about injuries and bruising visible in video. The exhibit was also addressed during Jane's cross-examination concerning a reconstruction of a June confrontation.
2 mentions
video — The video was discussed during Israel Florez's cross-examination, including testimony about the locations of flowers and a vase and whether Mr. Combs made aggressive movements toward Cassie. At a Day 23 sidebar, the court addressed a request to strike a witness's statement of disappointment in the video.
2 mentions
10C-101; 10C-102; 10C-106–10C-111 — Exhibits 10C-101, 10C-102, and 10C-106 through 10C-111 were video versions addressed during a Day 18 evidentiary ruling. The court excluded them pending a possible door-opening by the defense.
1 mention
10C-103 — Exhibit 10C-103 was replayed during Frank Piazza's cross-examination as counsel questioned him about issues in the underlying video system. Piazza agreed that the displayed sequence appeared to omit nearly 15 seconds, while discussing artifacts and timestamp behavior.
1 mention
10C-115 — Exhibit 10C-115 was a compilation that inserted cellphone footage between surveillance segments to bridge a period not recorded by the surveillance system. The defense cross-examined the preparer about motion activity, visual artifacts, and timestamp issues.
1 mention
115 — Exhibit 115 was a government video compilation that the defense argued could mislead viewers about timing and sequence. The court later overruled the defense’s Rule 403 objection to the modified compilation.
1 mention
2016 InterContinental Hotel video — The 2016 InterContinental Hotel video was discussed in the court's post-verdict bail ruling. The court stated that the video starkly depicted violence involving Cassie Ventura and quoted the defense's closing description of it as domestic violence.
1 mention
AX-102-G; AX-102-S — Exhibits AX-102-G and AX-102-S were videos from the November 2021 time period. The defense played selected portions of both during Joseph Cerciello’s Day 32 cross-examination.
1 mention
AX-103-A — Exhibit AX-103-A was a video listed on a chart for the period from December 3 through December 6, 2021. The defense played the entire video during Joseph Cerciello’s Day 32 cross-examination.
1 mention
broadcast videos and other videos addressed in Mr. McCourt's analysis — The broadcast videos and other videos addressed in Mr. McCourt's analysis were the subject of a Day 1 ruling on proposed expert testimony. The court permitted limited technical testimony about transcoding or other modifications, while barring speculation about authenticity and characterizations of real-world perception.
1 mention
BX-201 through BX-210 — Exhibits BX-201 through BX-210 were ten videos offered during Frank Piazza’s direct testimony. The court admitted the videos under seal without objection.
1 mention
BX203 — Exhibit BX203 was a media excerpt played from its beginning through three minutes and 50 seconds during a Day 29 procedural discussion.
1 mention
BX205 — Exhibit BX205 was a video tied to a chart entry. The defense played a segment from seven minutes through eight minutes and 23 seconds during DeLeassa Penland’s Day 29 cross-examination.
1 mention
BX206 — Exhibit BX206 was a video for which the defense played several selected segments during DeLeassa Penland’s Day 29 cross-examination.
1 mention
BX207 — BX207 was a video exhibit from which the defense played selected clips during Agent Penland's cross-examination on Day 29.
1 mention
BX209 — BX209 was one of three videos associated with a December 2014 chart entry. The defense played two selected portions during Agent Penland's cross-examination on Day 29.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1278 — Defense Exhibit 1278 was an approximately 30-second video of Mr. Combs in nature speaking about religion and God. Defense counsel said it was sent to Ms. Ventura after he attended rehab and anticipated using it only to refresh her recollection outside the jury's presence.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1750 and redacted version — Defense Exhibit 1750 and its redacted version are a video shown during Mia's cross-examination on Day 18. The court admitted the video after the defense established its date.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3299 — Defense Exhibit 3299 was a video played during Jane's cross-examination on Day 25.
1 mention
EX173; EX176 — Government Exhibits EX173 and EX176 were videos played during Joseph Cerciello's cross-examination on Day 33.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 10C-103 and 10C-104 — Government Exhibits 10C-103 and 10C-104 are InterContinental Century City surveillance footage shown during Casandra Ventura's direct testimony on Day 7. Ventura identified herself backing away with her arm raised as Sean walked toward her in one of the displayed clips.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 10C-103, 10C-104, and 10C-105 — Government Exhibits 10C-103, 10C-104, and 10C-105 were corrected surveillance videos. Frank Piazza testified that he corrected their playback-speed issue but that visual distortions, motion activity, and timestamp issues were embedded in the recorded files.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 10C-104 — Government Exhibit 10C-104 is surveillance video of a Century City InterContinental hallway. It was played during Casandra Ventura's Day 6 direct testimony after she described being thrown down in the elevator lobby.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 10C-105 — Government Exhibit 10C-105 is surveillance video of the opposite side of the InterContinental hallway. It was played during Casandra Ventura's Day 6 direct testimony after she described covering her face and remaining on the ground.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 10C-115 — Government Exhibit 10C-115 was a chronological multi-camera video compilation prepared by Frank Piazza using overlapping visual anchor points, with black screens marking camera or segment changes. The court admitted the compilation during Piazza's direct examination.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 115 — Government Exhibit 115 was a compilation of exhibits already in evidence, modified with video breaks to address timing concerns. The court overruled the defense's Rule 403 objection and admitted it.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3B-101 and 3B-102 — Government Exhibits 3B-101 and 3B-102 were cell-phone recordings of a computer monitor playing security-system footage. Frank Piazza identified them as two of the original files he analyzed and testified that their metadata showed a March 5, 2016 recording date.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3B-101, 3B-102, 10C-103, 10C-104, and 10C-105 — Government Exhibit 3B-101, 3B-102, 10C-103, 10C-104, and 10C-105 consisted of two cell-phone recordings and three hotel-surveillance videos. Israel Florez testified that the files fairly and accurately depicted what he saw on March 5, 2016, and the court admitted them.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 9 A-102 — Government Exhibit 9 A-102 was an Instagram video played during Jane's testimony on Day 23. The court instructed the jury to disregard the questions and answers that followed an earlier playing of the video, then permitted the video to be played again.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 9A-102 — Government Exhibit 9A-102 was a video that Jane described seeing while in Miami. Jane testified that reading portions of Cassie's lawsuit felt like reading her own story and later described seeing the video.
1 mention
Government Exhibit AX-102 and AX-102-D — Government Exhibit AX-102 contains metadata for explicit videos dated November 8 to 10, 2021, and AX-102-D is a clip from one of the videos. On Day 32, the jury viewed the first two minutes and 30 seconds of AX-102-D after testimony identified its November 10, 2021 creation date.
1 mention
Government Exhibit BX-202-B — Government Exhibit BX-202-B is an image from a larger video that Casandra Ventura identified as depicting Jules during a freak-off. Ventura testified on Day 7 that the video was found on a device she gave to the government.
1 mention
Government Exhibit BX205, BX206, and BX209 — Government Exhibits BX205, BX206, and BX209 are video clips referenced among records and communications used to confirm entries in government charts. On Day 28, selected clips were played only for the Court, witness, and jury while overflow and gallery feeds were off.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-161 — Government Exhibit E-161 is a video shown during Jane's resumed cross-examination on Day 24. The court admitted the video under seal before it was played.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-162 — Government Exhibit E-162 is a video shown during Jane's resumed cross-examination on Day 24. Jane agreed that it depicted a villa where people gave her green juices, and the court admitted the video under seal.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-163 — Government Exhibit E-163 is a video Jane said she recorded at the villa where she stayed in Turks in February 2021. Jane testified that the video shows the villa pool, its ambience, Sean, and the weather.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-165 — Government Exhibit E-165 is a video that Jane testified she took. It was admitted and played during her resumed cross-examination on Day 24.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-260 — Government Exhibit E-260 is a video referenced during Jane's cross-examination on Day 26. The examination reconstructed the timing and sequence of a June confrontation and events leading to Antoine's arrival.
1 mention
InterContinental Hotel surveillance video and $100,000 payment records — The InterContinental Hotel surveillance video and $100,000 payment records were discussed together in the government's closing argument. The government argued that hotel security footage was obtained after communications with Eddy Garcia and a cash payment.
1 mention
InterContinental surveillance video — The InterContinental surveillance video was replayed during the defense closing argument. Defense counsel acknowledged serious violence in the footage while arguing that the dispute concerned a phone and was not sex trafficking.
1 mention
photos or videos that do not depict Jane — The photos or videos that do not depict Jane were discussed in a hearing on public exhibit access. The government said such materials could be released the same day, while text messages would require review and redaction for identifying information.
1 mention
recorded hotel-night videos — The recorded hotel-night videos were discussed in the defense closing argument. Counsel urged the jury to consider the videos and characterized them as showing meals, music, conversation, and nonaggressive intimacy.
1 mention
surveillance videos — The surveillance videos were discussed during Israel Florez's recross-examination as motion-sensored recordings. Florez agreed that time gaps could result from a lack of significant movement, a glitch, or another system problem.
1 mention
the BX series videos — The BX series videos were the subject of a Day 9 agreement about presentation procedure. The parties agreed the videos could be played through the government's video expert, who could not comment on events depicted because he was not a participant.
1 mention
two guard-recorded cell-phone videos and three CNN broadcast videos related to the InterContinental Hotel — The two guard-recorded cell-phone videos and three corrected CNN broadcast videos related to the InterContinental Hotel were offered by agreement on Day 4. The defense stated it had no objection so long as it could question the government's expert later, and the court ordered the agreed exhibits into evidence.
1 mention
video at 10C-103, 31 to 56 seconds — The video segment from Exhibit 10C-103, running from 31 to 56 seconds, was played during Israel Florez's redirect examination. The government then asked Florez to identify the direction in which he said Combs dragged Cassie.
1 mention
video capturing the defendant brutally beating Cassie during a freak-off at an LA hotel — In its opening statement, the government said it expected the jury to see video of an alleged attack on Cassie at an LA hotel during a freak-off. The government described the anticipated video as part of the evidence it expected to present at trial.
1 mention
videos of some of the freak-offs — The videos were described in the government’s opening statement as recordings of portions of encounters referred to as freak-offs. The government said it expected the videos to show the defendant providing directions to Cassie and Jane during those encounters.
1 mention
videos the government intends to introduce later — The videos were discussed during a Day 6 hearing on proposed restrictions for sexually explicit visual material and associated audio. The government said it intended to introduce videos later in the trial.
1 mention
videotapes of the so-called freak-offs or hotel nights — The videotapes were described in the defense opening statement as depicting Sean Combs, one of his girlfriends, and a man during encounters called freak-offs, hotel nights, or wild king nights. The defense said the recordings were intimate and had not been intended for people outside the room to see.
1 mention

Audio Evidence (17)

1217 / 1217-A — Recording 1217 is a 25-minute recording that the parties agreed could be offered with accompanying metadata marked as 1217-A.
1 mention
A-166, A-168, A-210A, A-515-A, A-159 — Government Exhibits A-166, A-168, A-210A, A-515-A, and A-159 are audio-message exhibits corrected before being provided to the jury. The parties agreed to restore pages showing the date, time, and file name of the audio messages; the exhibits otherwise remained unchanged.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1217 and 1217-A — Defense Exhibits 1217 and 1217-A were played during Casandra Ventura's cross-examination, where questioning addressed her concerns about possible recordings of freak-offs.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3023-A — Defense Exhibit 3023-A is an audio exhibit identified as Defendant's Exhibit 3023-A and played during Jane's resumed cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3103-A and 3103-B — Defense Exhibits 3103-A and 3103-B were audio exhibits played during Jane's cross-examination on Day 24 after the court admitted them, with 3103-B received under seal.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3226-A — Defense Exhibit 3226-A is an unredacted audio message discussed before Jane's testimony on Day 26. The court ruled that disputed portions were hearsay and did not establish the defendant's then-existing state of mind.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3226-C-R — Defense Exhibit 3226-C-R is a redacted audio message from a December 20, 2023 message exchange. The court admitted the redacted version and it was played during Jane's cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3311 — Defense Exhibit 3311 was identified as an audio exhibit during Jane's Day 26 cross-examination.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 442-35-A — Government Exhibit 442-35-A is an audio message played during Jane's direct testimony. After it was played, Jane testified that she understood references to being on his job as financial support and to disappearing as the possibility of being cut off.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A-104-11-A — Government Exhibit A-104-11-A was an audio exhibit played during Jane's resumed direct testimony on Day 22. Jane testified that she repeatedly communicated that she did not want to continue hotel nights and used Notes and texts when direct conversations were difficult.
1 mention
Government Exhibit AX-701-79-B — Government Exhibit AX-701-79-B is an audio-enhanced exhibit associated with an additional sexually explicit video. The court admitted it under seal on Day 20.
1 mention
Government Exhibit AX-701-79B — Government Exhibit AX-701-79B is a recording played during Jane's direct testimony after she confirmed that the displayed transcript accurately captured the audible voices. The recording was related to one of Jane's requests for condoms.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-348-AR — Government Exhibit C-348-AR is one of two call recordings authenticated through file information and Jane's recognition of the conversations. Jane testified that she did not know the calls were being recorded, and the redactions removed references to her true name.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-348-BR — Government Exhibit C-348-BR is one of two call recordings authenticated through file information and Jane's recognition of the conversations. Jane testified that she did not know the calls were being recorded, and the redactions removed references to her true name.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-349, C-349-B, and C-349-C — Government Exhibits C-349, C-349-B, and C-349-C include a recording that Jonathan Perez identified as a conversation between himself and Khorram. By stipulation, the court admitted the recording-related exhibits, and part of C-349-B was played.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C348A, C348B, and 1410 — Government Exhibits C348A, C348B, and 1410 include recorded calls and communications involving Jane, Mia, K.K., and D-Roc after Cassie's lawsuit. In closing argument, the government discussed the calls involving Jane and stated that they were recorded on K.K.'s phone.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C349B — Government Exhibit C349B is the audio file itself. The first minute and ten seconds were played during Ananya Sankar's direct testimony.
1 mention

Digital Evidence (150)

Government Exhibit B-625 — Government Exhibit B-625 contains messages between Sean Combs and Casandra Ventura concerning plans for a freak-off and, in March 2016 messages, where Ventura could stay and retrieve her belongings. The exhibit was used alongside a chart and timeline with underlying messages and dates.
4 mentions
Defense Exhibit 1016 — Defense Exhibit 1016 is a 12-page exhibit containing a 2012 message in which Ventura responded to a request for a final freak-off by saying she wanted it to be the first time for the rest of their lives. The court admitted the exhibit without objection after the parties addressed its complete form.
3 mentions
Defense Exhibit 1088 — Defense Exhibit 1088 contains March 2016 messages between Ventura and Combs, including messages not included on a timeline chart. The defense used the exhibit while questioning a timeline's omitted communications and in later argument about messages surrounding the InterContinental incident.
3 mentions
Government Exhibit B-631 — Government Exhibit B-631 contains March 10, 2016 messages from Ventura to Combs referring to bruising, concerns about drugs or drinking, and being knocked around. Ventura identified the message during cross-examination, and the court admitted the exhibit without objection.
3 mentions
Defense Exhibit 1019 — Defense Exhibit 1019 was discussed during Casandra Ventura's recross-examination on Day 9. The defense revisited messages and sexual communications while questioning Ventura's account of what she understood Sean Combs to be requesting.
2 mentions
Defense Exhibit 1159 — Defense Exhibit 1159 is a BlackBerry conversation between Casandra Ventura and Sean Combs dated August 5, 2009. Ventura said it appeared to be a real conversation, and the court admitted it during her cross-examination on Day 8.
2 mentions
Defense Exhibit 1616 — Defense Exhibit 1616 is a five-photograph exhibit that included images from social gatherings and favorable moments within a group. Testimony on Day 28 distinguished its photographs from images drawn from a Jane Doe iCloud account, and stated that Kristina Khorram was not a participant in the exhibit's chat.
2 mentions
Defense Exhibit 1856 — Defense Exhibit 1856 is a text message associated with Bryana Bongolan's phone number and another number and email address. The court admitted it on Day 21 after Bongolan recognized her number.
2 mentions
Defense Exhibit 3327 — Defense Exhibit 3327 was discussed during Jane's cross-examination and later cited in closing argument. Defense counsel described it as a message exchange in which Jane liked a Cowboys4Angels message before an escort was sent, then rejected.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit B-200 — Government Exhibit B-200 is a MacBook Air laptop from which an examiner extracted data. The examiner testified that the device showed a Frank Black user profile and a guest profile, and that a separate user partition was preserved but not searched until a warrant was obtained.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit B-324 — Government Exhibit B-324 is a text-message chain between Daniel Phillip and Casandra Ventura. Phillip identified the messages as accurately reflecting their exchanges, and the court admitted the exhibit on Day 5.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit B-332 — Government Exhibit B-332 was identified during Casandra Ventura's recross as a common video. The court admitted it during redirect on Day 9.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit C-364-4 — Government Exhibit C-364-4 is a March 6, 2016 chat between Kerry Morgan and Kristina Khorram. Morgan identified the chat after describing police arriving at an apartment, and the court admitted the exhibit on Day 10.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit J-141 — Government Exhibit J-141 is an excerpt of data from Faheem Muhammad's cell phone that included notes described as cash transactions. The court initially excluded the exhibit for lack of foundation, while allowing a later request based on further foundation or an agreed redaction.
2 mentions
1054 — Exhibit 1054 contained messages concerning a sexual encounter between Ms. Ventura and Mr. Combs in his office. The court found no demonstrated connection between the messages and an alleged sex-trafficking incident.
1 mention
1136-R; 1149 — Exhibit 1136-R included a message in which Ms. Ventura said she would be Mr. Combs' “little freak.” Exhibit 1149 contained messages that the court found could potentially relate to an alleged incident, including references to baby oil and a hotel.
1 mention
1728; 1728-R — Defendant's Exhibits 1728 and 1728-R included a text-message exhibit admitted during Mia's cross-examination. The court later addressed uncertainty about the displayed message participants and obtained agreement that defense exhibits would identify their sources going forward.
1 mention
1740; 1740-R — Defendant's Exhibits 1740 and 1740-R showed a collage of photographs Mia said she assembled from prior birthday posts for Mr. Combs. Exhibit 1740 was admitted under seal, and Exhibit 1740-R was admitted publicly.
1 mention
3A-119, 3A-150, 3T-101, 3T-102, 3T-103, 3T-105 through 108, C-508, H-115, H-116 — The listed exhibits were correspondence between Mia, Mr. Combs, and people who worked for him. Mia identified the emails or phone numbers and testified that the communications fairly and accurately represented those exchanges.
1 mention
3T-111 and 3T-111-R — Government Exhibits 3T-111 and 3T-111-R were an email between Mia and Mr. Combs. Mia testified that 3T-111-R was a redacted version of 3T-111.
1 mention
3T-112 and 3T-112-R — Government Exhibits 3T-112 and 3T-112-R were an email exchange between Mia and D-Roc. The court admitted 3T-112 under seal and admitted the redacted version, 3T-112-R.
1 mention
402 — Defense Exhibit 402 was a text exchange between Ms. Ventura and Mr. Kaplan that included her request for drugs in Boston. The court reserved ruling on the exhibit on Day 12 and later allowed the unobjected portions concerning the drug request and response.
1 mention
A104-5 — Exhibit A104-5 displayed additional message records involving Jane and Kabrale. Defense counsel reviewed messages and emojis that did not appear in Government Exhibit 1407.
1 mention
A432 — Government Exhibit A432 was a chat from one of the defendant's phones with a contact identified as One Stop using a number ending in 7333. The government argued that the chat's content and the overlapping number supported identification of One Stop and a drug-related meaning.
1 mention
alleged Victim 3 message — The alleged Victim 3 message was identified as Exhibit A-629-A during a Day 27 admissibility dispute. The court maintained its exclusion under Rule 404(b)(3), for lack of proper foundation, and after Rule 403 balancing.
1 mention
B-100, B-200, B-300 — B-100, B-200, and B-300 were three devices provided by Ms. Ventura and searched with her consent. During cross-examination, Joshua Croft was questioned about the devices' condition and the scope of data extraction and review.
1 mention
B-200 — B-200 was a MacBook Air that powered on and had Frank Black and guest user profiles. Joshua Croft testified that the extraction log showed successful collection without errors, though the guest profile contained no material.
1 mention
B-210 through B-412 — Government Exhibits B-210 through B-412 and the listed subdivisions were offered and admitted on Day 7. Defense counsel stated there was no objection except that B-324 had already been admitted.
1 mention
B-300 — B-300 was an older MacBook Pro that did not complete its boot process and emitted a faint clicking sound. Joshua Croft testified that apparent hard-drive damage prevented recovery of some data.
1 mention
B-315 — B-315 is a text-message exhibit addressed in a ruling on the admissibility of prior consistent statements. The court concluded that the defense opening supplied the required predicate for its introduction.
1 mention
B-316 — B-316 was part of the same text thread as B-315 and captured more of that thread. The court applied the prior-consistent-statement rule and allowed both exhibits on Day 6.
1 mention
B-329 — B-329 was considered with other proposed text-message exhibits under the prior-consistent-statement rule. The court found that the required standard had not yet been met for B-329 on Day 6.
1 mention
B-332 — B-332 was considered with other proposed text-message exhibits under the prior-consistent-statement rule. The court found that the required standard had not yet been met for B-332 on Day 6.
1 mention
B-series exhibits — The B-series exhibits were materials from a drive reviewed by Casandra Ventura. The court admitted the listed exhibit groups and their subdivisions on Day 6.
1 mention
broken electronic devices and explicit videos — The broken electronic devices and explicit videos were devices Casandra Ventura said she kept after her relationship with Sean ended. She testified that she feared they contained explicit videos and did not want someone else to see them if she brought the devices to an Apple store.
1 mention
C-259-D — Exhibit C-259-D was an email screenshot found on Kristina Khorram's phone. On Day 27, the court sustained an objection to its use after noting that Khorram's response did not mention Kabrale Williams.
1 mention
C-263, C-264, C-265 — Exhibits C-263, C-264, and C-265 are text-message chains between Jane and Kristina Khorram. The court overruled objections on Day 27 after the government said it relied on Khorram's statements rather than Jane's statements for their truth.
1 mention
C-334-A — Exhibit C-334-A is a chat between KK's main phone and Eli Maroun. During DeLeassa Penland's cross-examination on Day 29, counsel identified it as source information for a chart entry concerning linen damage and deep cleaning at the L'Ermitage Hotel.
1 mention
C-366 — Exhibit C-366 is a chat message between Ryan Lopez and Kristina Khorram. On Day 27, the court overruled an objection after discussion of communications made as part of their work facilitating Sean Combs's hotel visits.
1 mention
C-367 — Exhibit C-367 is a message chain between Sean Combs and Kristina Khorram. In the Day 27 ruling, the government described an earlier message about Paul coming to a hotel room as supporting Khorram's knowledge of his association with Cowboys and Angels.
1 mention
C-653-1; H-101-A; 1301 — Exhibits C-653-1 and H-101-A were published with portions of Stipulation 1301. The published materials included excerpts of data from phones used by Kristina Khorram and from a phone seized from Damien Butler, including text-message excerpts displayed in court.
1 mention
C-653-1; H-101-A; A-417; J-308 — Exhibits C-653-1, H-101-A, A-417, and J-308 are a group of government digital exhibits. The court admitted the group on Day 27.
1 mention
C361 and C362 — Exhibits C361 and C362 are videos and images considered during a Day 27 Rule 403 dispute. The court overruled the objections for the reasons stated by the government during the colloquy.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1004 — Defense Exhibit 1004 is a nine-page text-message exchange that Casandra Ventura identified as a communication between herself and Mr. Combs during cross-examination on Day 8.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1007 — Defense Exhibit 1007 is a 14-page text communication between Casandra Ventura and Sean Combs, with timestamps from July 29 through July 31, 2012. During Ventura's cross-examination on Day 8, the defense said it encompassed much of Government Exhibit 346, and the court admitted it without objection.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1028 — Defense Exhibit 1028 is a conversation that Casandra Ventura identified as being between herself and Mr. Combs after questioning about his relationship with Gina.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1035 — Defense Exhibit 1035 is a conversation that Casandra Ventura said looked like a conversation with Mr. Combs and resembled other conversations reviewed during her cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1177 — Defense Exhibit 1177 is a BlackBerry communication between Casandra Ventura and Mr. Combs dated August 18, 2009. Ventura said her response in the exchange referred to setting up a room for a freak-off.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1179 — Defense Exhibit 1179 is a BlackBerry communication between Casandra Ventura and Mr. Combs dated December 8, 2009. Ventura said she did not remember the exchange but that it appeared to be a communication between them.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1303-A — Defense Exhibit 1303-A was admitted during Casandra Ventura's cross-examination on Day 9. It was among successive texts and other records the defense used to test Ventura's recollection and characterizations.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1307 — Defense Exhibit 1307 was admitted during Casandra Ventura's cross-examination on Day 9. The court ordered disputed material redacted for jury use and initially limited display to the first four pages.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1340 — Defense Exhibit 1340 is a screenshot of a conversation between Casandra Ventura and Kristina Khorram, with related metadata and Khorram contact information. On Day 21, the parties disputed its admissibility in connection with the balcony incident discussed in testimony.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1353 — Defense Exhibit 1353 is a set of historical messages introduced during Casandra Ventura's cross-examination on Day 8. Ventura testified that she and Sean Combs regularly exchanged messages about what they were feeling and thinking, and the court overruled an objection to the exhibit.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1409 — Defense Exhibit 1409 was displayed during Casandra Ventura's cross-examination on Day 9. The examination addressed post-relationship communications, Ventura's view that domestic violence was the issue, and a 2012 message concerning a freak-off.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1501 — Defense Exhibit 1501 was identified as an accurate text-message exchange during Dawn Richard's cross-examination on Day 10. The court said the defense had not yet laid the foundation needed to introduce it for impeachment, but could try again as a prior inconsistent statement.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1612 — Defense Exhibit 1612 was a message exhibit associated with a cellphone number and an abbreviation identified as Frank Black, Mr. Combs. The court admitted the exhibit after overruling objections subject to further objection based on questioning.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1735 — Defense Exhibit 1735 was a text-message thread discussed during a Day 16 evidentiary ruling. The court excluded it for purposes other than impeachment, while allowing the defense to seek a later ruling if the examination warranted it.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1737 sealed — Defense Exhibit 1737 sealed is a text message that Mia said sounded like her message, though she did not remember it. The court admitted Exhibit 1737 under seal and its redacted counterpart on Day 18.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1737r — Defense Exhibit 1737r is a digital defense exhibit associated with the Day 18 cross-examination of Mia.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1748 — Defense Exhibit 1748 was discussed with Defense Exhibit 1794 during a Day 19 clarification about whether the exhibits were already in evidence. The court stated that the exhibits would be admitted after a formal offer.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1794 — Defense Exhibit 1794 was discussed with Defense Exhibit 1748 during a Day 19 clarification about whether the exhibits were already in evidence. The court stated that the exhibits would be admitted after a formal offer.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1806-R — Defense Exhibit 1806-R was a redacted text-message exhibit associated with Deonte Nash's telephone number. The court admitted it with agreed redactions during his Day 16 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1818 — Defense Exhibit 1818 was a text exchange that included messages about going out of town and a "secret trip." The court overruled the hearsay objection after considering the messages as statements of future intent or plan.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1820 — Defense Exhibit 1820 was a text exchange considered during a Day 15 hearsay ruling. The court ruled that a statement made at 4:00 a.m. during the events in question could be admitted as a statement describing or explaining an event immediately after it was perceived.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1852 — Defense Exhibit 1852 was a text-message exchange admitted without objection during Bryana Bongolan's Day 21 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1853 — Defense Exhibit 1853 was a text-message exchange involving phone numbers identified during Bryana Bongolan's Day 21 cross-examination. The court admitted the exhibit without objection.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1855 — Defense Exhibit 1855 was considered during a Day 20 ruling on hearsay and unfair-prejudice objections. The court concluded that the exhibit could be admitted under Rule 803(3) if offered at the appropriate juncture.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3007 — Counsel used October 29 to early November 2021 text messages between Jane and Combs during cross-examination; the court admitted Defense Exhibit 3007 under seal.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3011 — The court admitted Defense Exhibit 3011 under seal. Counsel used its November 5, 2021 messages to question Jane about affectionate exchanges and a proposed birthday celebration.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3016 — During cross-examination, defense counsel used November 9 messages in Exhibit 3016 to ask Jane about intimate exchanges with Combs; the court admitted the exhibit under seal.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3018-R — Defense Exhibit 3018-R was admitted under seal after the parties addressed an agreed redaction during Jane's cross-examination on Day 24.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3033 — The court admitted Defense Exhibit 3033 under seal. Counsel used its December 13, 2021 messages to question Jane about affectionate language in her exchanges with Combs.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3034 — The court admitted Defense Exhibit 3034 under seal. Counsel used the messages to question Jane about affectionate and sexual language she had written to Combs.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3035 — Defense Exhibit 3035 was admitted under seal without objection during Jane's Day 25 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3038 — Defense Exhibit 3038 was a January 1, 2022 text chain between Jane and Mr. Combs. The court admitted the exhibit under seal during Jane's Day 25 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3050 — Defense Exhibit 3050 displayed messages concerning dinner and hotel plans in an April 2022 exchange. The court admitted the exhibit under seal on Day 33.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3071-R — Defense Exhibit 3071-R is a redacted version of Exhibit 3071. The court admitted it under seal after the parties agreed to redact specified messages and not show certain images.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3226 — Defense Exhibit 3226 is a December 20, 2023 message between Jane and Mr. Combs. The court admitted it under seal during Jane's cross-examination on Day 26.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3246 and 3248 — Defense Exhibits 3246 and 3248 concerned December 2 and December 30 messages that Jane linked to occasions when she transported drugs for Mr. Combs. The Court admitted the exhibits under seal during Jane's cross-examination on Day 24.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3306 — Defense Exhibit 3306 was identified during Jane's cross-examination on Day 26.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3328 — Defense Exhibit 3328 contains messages between Jane and Kabrale, including messages from November 2021 about a possible visit. Defense counsel displayed the messages while contrasting additional message context with Government Exhibit 1407.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 404 — Defense Exhibit 404 is a photograph identified as depicting Kristina Khorram, Mr. Combs, and George Kaplan. The court admitted the photograph during Kaplan's cross-examination on Day 13.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 946 — Defense Exhibit 946 is a text-message exchange that Clark recognized in part, including her phone number and a reference to Jeanette DeLoan. Clark said she did not remember the exchange.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 952 — Defense Exhibit 952 was among communications used to question Clark about seeking forgiveness, a recommendation, and a return to work.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 965 — Defense Exhibit 965 was an email expressing a wish to be Mr. Combs's friend again. Clark said the message reflected an effort to recover her life and career rather than a simple desire to protect him.
1 mention
Defense Exhibits 1730–1733 and redacted versions — Defense Exhibits 1730 through 1733 consist of text-message exchanges that Mia recognized as her messages, although she said she did not remember some of them. The court admitted redacted versions and admitted the unredacted versions under seal on Day 18.
1 mention
Defense text-message exhibits — Defense text-message exhibits were discussed in a Day 8 procedural hearing about anticipated defense messages. Defense counsel said the messages could be offered for their effect on the listener and for state of mind, while the government sought a non-hearsay basis for each message the defense intended to enter.
1 mention
DNA analysis concerning a glass bottle — The DNA analysis concerning a glass bottle involved a partial profile that defense counsel said was consistent with a female contributor. The court allowed proposed questioning about the DNA information for the time being, while reserving reassessment after Investigator Jiminez's direct examination if needed.
1 mention
E-331-K through P — E-331-K through P consists of six Notes app entries written between November 2023 and March 2024. The government sought to use them on redirect as prior consistent statements, while the defense opposed their admission.
1 mention
E-331-M — E-331-M is a December 2023 Notes app entry. The government sought to introduce a short excerpt in response to a defense credibility challenge.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1510 — Government Exhibit 1510 is a binder of Brendan Paul's employment-related text messages and photographs. Paul identified the communications and photographs as fair and accurate, and the court admitted the listed exhibits, with specified materials under seal.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3A-107 — Government Exhibit 3A-107 is a digital record discussed during DeLeassa Penland's direct examination on Day 28. It was used with other records concerning a potential December 2009 meeting in New York City at the London Hotel.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3A-109 — Government Exhibit 3A-109 is a digital record discussed during DeLeassa Penland's direct examination on Day 28. It was used with other records concerning a potential December 2009 meeting in New York City at the London Hotel.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3D-103-A through J-122 — Government Exhibit 3D-103-A through J-122 comprises text-message exhibits identified by Jonathan Perez as fair and accurate representations of his messages. The exhibits include redactions of Jane's true name and were admitted without opposition.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3D-126 — Government Exhibit 3D-126 was a text-message chain between Jonathan Perez and Jane discussed during Perez's cross-examination on Day 27. The parties disputed admission of the full chain and redactions before the exhibit was admitted subject to further redactions.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3D-129-A — Government Exhibit 3D-129-A showed messages containing receipts that Perez identified during testimony about cash obtained through security or Combs's belongings. Perez testified that he did not submit receipts for drug purchases.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3G-112-R — Government Exhibit 3G-112-R is an iPhone Notes schedule created by K.K. Brendan Paul explained entries referring to a planned hotel event and continued partying.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3G-123 — Government Exhibit 3G-123 is a February 20, 2024 text conversation involving Brendan Paul, Jonathan Perez, and Baby Girl. Paul testified that Perez introduced him to Baby Girl through the chat.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3T-101-R — Government Exhibit 3T-101-R is a screenshot of WhatsApp messages between Mia and Puff during a trip to South Africa. Mia identified the participants and testified that Combs's messages pressured her to call him.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3T-102-R — Government Exhibit 3T-102-R consists of text messages from Puff to Mia. Mia was examined about later messages from D-Roc and Combs and what she understood from those contacts.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 905-A — Government Exhibit 905-A was the subject of an evidentiary dispute during Day 19 testimony. The court overruled the defense objection after hearing arguments about hearsay and the role of D-Roc's statements.
1 mention
Government Exhibit a 417 — Government Exhibit A-417 was a 49-page text-message chain discussed during Day 26 redirect. The parties disputed whether messages referring to spending on "flower" and other cash transactions had sufficient supporting context.
1 mention
Government Exhibit a 432 — Government Exhibit A-432 contains communications involving a contact listed as One Stop. The court found that the shared contact number in D-Roc's and Combs's phones, along with the messages and prior testimony, supplied a relevance foundation.
1 mention
Government Exhibit a 518 — Government Exhibit A-518 was a communication among D-Roc, Faheem, and Combs concerning cash in a safe. The court sustained the defense objection after hearing arguments about its probative value and possible unfair prejudice.
1 mention
Government Exhibit a 629 a — GX-A-629-A, part two, was the subject of an admissibility dispute concerning a text message and alleged violence involving Gina. On Day 26, the Court reserved decision pending review of the government's letter, the defense arguments, and an earlier transcript.
1 mention
Government Exhibit a 905 a — GX-A-905-A was a text-message conversation involving Mr. Combs and D-Roc. Defense counsel sought targeted redactions for references to statements by another individual, citing hearsay-within-hearsay concerns.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A-104-66 — Government Exhibit A-104-66 contained messages Jane read during redirect on Day 26. In the messages, Jane wrote that she needed a break and did not want to continue hotel-room drug use and performances.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A-1500 — Government Exhibit A-1500 is a hard drive recovered from a bag in a hallway closet. Special Agent Binda identified the hard drive during Day 9 testimony about items recovered from the closet.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A-441-I — Government Exhibit A-441-I is a chat between Casandra Ventura and Sean. The court admitted the chat without objection during Ventura's Day 9 redirect testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A-442-9 — Government Exhibit A-442-9 is a text exchange between Combs and Jane from August 4, 2023. During rebuttal closing, the government discussed Jane's response to a question about getting "freaky" and Combs's subsequent messages concerning the roof over her head.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A-600, A-700, and A-1400 — Government Exhibits A-600, A-700, and A-1400 are three cellphones recovered from a black Balenciaga boot in room R. Special Agent Gannon identified the phones during Day 12 testimony, and a stipulation described their seizure from a master-bedroom closet.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A900-A and A-905-A — Government Exhibits A900-A and A-905-A were offered under a stipulation identifying A900-A through A926 as extracts from Government Exhibit A900, a cell phone seized from a bedroom at 2 Star Island. The Court admitted the exhibits on Day 20, and the government published a preliminary device report and a September 13, 2015 chat.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-244 — Government Exhibit B-244 was an admitted text exchange used during Casandra Ventura's direct testimony. The government used the exchange while eliciting her account of arranging an escort, hotel-room details, Astroglide, and drug timing.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-326 — The digital exhibit labeled Government Exhibit B-326 was identified during Casandra Ventura's direct testimony on Day 6.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-414 — Government Exhibit B-414 was a text-message exchange that included March 18, 2017 messages between Ms. Ventura and Mr. Combs. The Court allowed the defense to read four completing messages after finding that their omission could potentially leave a misimpression.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-504 — Government Exhibit B-504 was published as a PDF version of a Cellebrite Reader report during Enrique Santos's direct testimony. Santos explained that deleted messages can have missing or corrupted fields and that exported PDFs may not display all emojis or embed audio files.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-513 — Government Exhibit B-513 displayed messages Ventura identified as sent from her to Sean. Ventura testified that one message referred to freak-offs and another referred to recovering from abuse.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-609 — Government Exhibit B-609 was a digital exhibit identified during Ventura's direct testimony on Day 7, when the government paired her account with an email, photographs, and a message thread.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B428 — Government Exhibit B428 was a text conversation between Ventura and Mr. Combs. The Court admitted it during Ventura's cross-examination on Day 8.
1 mention
Government Exhibit c 501 — GX-C-501 was a message from Kristina Khorram to Ms. Greenhill requesting a $15,000 wire. The Court sustained the defense objection after finding the proposed relevance attenuated.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-251 — Government Exhibit C-251 concerned messages Jane said she sent to KK after an alleged threat involving recordings. Jane testified that she asked for phones containing the recordings to be put out of reach and that KK agreed.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-361-C — Government Exhibit C-361-C was admitted with C-361-CM and C-360-A after Bryana Bongolan's recross. The Court later denied a defense request to introduce two text-message chains as completing statements with C-361-C.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-361-C-M — Government Exhibit C-361-C-M was published as another extraction from a Cellebrite report during Enrique Santos's direct testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-361-CM — Government Exhibit C-361-CM was admitted with C-361-C and C-360-A after Bryana Bongolan's recross on Day 21.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-366 — Government Exhibit C-366 was displayed during the government's rebuttal closing. The government referred to a text exchange between Ryan Lopez and Kristina Khorram in arguing that Khorram knew about cowboy escorts.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-508-R — Government Exhibit C-508-R was a set of WhatsApp messages between Mia and Kristina Khorram. Mia testified that the messages arose while she understood others were pressuring her to contact Mr. Combs or get Cassie on the phone.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C360 — Government Exhibit C360 was admitted without objection as an excerpt of data extracted from Government Exhibit C300, identified in the stipulation as one of two cell phones seized from Kristina Khorram's person.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-331-A-R — Government Exhibit E-331-A-R was a redacted Notes exhibit used during Jane's direct testimony on Day 22. The Court admitted it in redacted form after the government corrected the exhibit labels.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-331-I — Government Exhibit E-331-I was a September 15, 2023 Notes app entry in which Jane wrote about not wanting to be used or locked in a room to fulfill fantasies, and about being treated like a sex worker in a hotel room. The exhibit was admitted and published during Jane's direct examination on Day 23.
1 mention
Government Exhibit G-101 — Government Exhibit G-101 included a June 19, 2022 text that Jane identified as Sean's message to Paul, sent about an hour and a half after other messages discussed in her redirect testimony. Jane read the message as asking Paul to persuade her and say that an event had been held since the prior week.
1 mention
Government Exhibit h 101 a — Government Exhibit H-101-A was a text-message exhibit involving Ms. Ventura and D-Roc, including statements about keys and feeling unsafe. On Day 26, the Court admitted the exhibit over objection after addressing the asserted hearsay exceptions.
1 mention
Government Exhibit h 110 — Government Exhibit H-110 contained text communications from D-Roc's phone involving a contact labeled One Stop. The Court found that the shared phone number across D-Roc's and Mr. Combs' phones, the message content, and prior testimony supplied a sufficient relevance foundation.
1 mention
Government Exhibit H-115-R — Government Exhibit H-115-R was a text-message exchange between Mia and D-Roc. Mia identified the exchange during her direct examination after describing D-Roc as someone she called her big brother.
1 mention
Government Exhibit j 308 — Government Exhibit J-308 was a chat involving Faheem and a person identified as Guido, with discussion of outstanding balances. The Court found a sufficient basis to treat the communications as within Faheem's agency relationship and overruled the objection.
1 mention
Government Exhibit J-120 — Government Exhibit J-120 contained June 2024 messages about requested cash and delivery arrangements. The government introduced the messages as the final example in a chart presented during Joseph Cerciello's direct examination.
1 mention
Government Exhibit J-122, J-121, and J-120 — Government Exhibits J-122, J-121, and J-120 included messages concerning a visit to Jane's house and a request for $3,500 in cash for Jane. Jonathan Perez testified that he did not independently clearly remember what ultimately happened with the money apart from the messages.
1 mention
GXH110 — GXH110 was a text communication involving D-Roc and a contact the government sought to identify as One Stop. On Day 30, the Court questioned whether the exhibit itself established that the exchange concerned drugs and requested further foundation.
1 mention
H-105-A and H-105-B — H-105-A and H-105-B were Butler-Combs message exhibits considered in connection with communications relayed from Mia. The court excluded H-105-A and most of H-105-B, admitting only the portion of H-105-B beginning with Mr. Combs's message, "Call me. Important."
1 mention
Jane's text messages — Jane's text messages were the subject of a discussion about public access and redaction of identifying information. The government proposed rolling release after review and redaction, while stating that messages it wanted the jury to notice would be read aloud in court unless sexually explicit.
1 mention
Jane's text messages and identifying-information exhibits — Jane's text messages and identifying-information exhibits included hundreds of pages containing her name, her child's name, nicknames, phone number, and address. The court disabled public and overflow exhibit displays during Jane's testimony to prevent identifying information from appearing on screen.
1 mention
Jane's text messages and notes concerning rent, hotel nights, and alleged threats — Jane's text messages and notes addressed rent, hotel nights, and alleged threats. During closing argument, the government cited the texts and notes as accounts written before Cassie's lawsuit.
1 mention
laptop containing only admitted exhibits — The laptop was prepared for deliberations and was to contain only admitted exhibits after review by the parties. The Court said it would confirm that condition before deliberations began.
1 mention
laptop containing only exhibits admitted into evidence — The laptop contained only exhibits admitted into evidence, according to both sides' agreement on Day 37.
1 mention
Proffered text messages between Mr. Combs and Ms. Ventura — The proffered text messages were exchanges between Mr. Combs and Ms. Ventura. The defense said most were offered for relationship context or state of mind rather than for the truth of an assertion.
1 mention
realtime communications — Realtime communications were described by the defense in opening statement as text messages showing that people loved Mr. Combs. The defense also asked jurors to consider communications surrounding the end of Ms. Ventura's relationship with him.
1 mention
Restamped text-message exhibit — The restamped text-message exhibit was the same substantive document as Defense Exhibit 1340, but with a government exhibit sticker. The court found it admissible for the stated hearsay and non-hearsay purposes.
1 mention
social media posts — The social media posts included pictures and statements. The court allowed the posts during a Day 16 evidentiary discussion.
1 mention
Text message exchange between Ms. Ventura and Mr. Combs — The text message exchange was between Ms. Ventura and Mr. Combs. The defense argued that its context bore on Mr. Combs' understanding of Ms. Ventura's substance use, and the court allowed the limited evidence.
1 mention
text messages involving K.K. and D-Roc — The text messages involving K.K. and D-Roc were discussed by the defense during closing argument in connection with calls and messages after the hammer incident. The defense characterized the communications as efforts to help Cassie.
1 mention
texts with Bridget from Cowboys4Angels — The texts with Bridget from Cowboys4Angels included a message concerning payment for an escort who could not perform. During rebuttal closing, the government argued that the exchange reflected the defendant's understanding of what the payment covered.
1 mention

Documents & Records (140)

Government Exhibit B-315 — Government Exhibit B-315 is an email referenced during testimony by Casandra Ventura, Regina Ventura, and Capricorn Clark. The examination used an email alongside photographs and other materials while developing accounts involving Mescudi and Ventura and events from 2011 to 2016.
3 mentions
Defense Exhibit 1373 — Defense Exhibit 1373 was a long text message between Ms. Ventura and Mr. Combs's chief of staff. The court considered whether portions could be used to show Ms. Ventura's state of mind while requiring review of factual assertions and proposed redactions.
2 mentions
Defense Exhibit 3604 — Defense Exhibit 3604 was identified as a typical TriStar expense submission supported by receipts and was admitted without objection. On redirect, Jonathan Perez was asked about entries including a new hookah and baby oil and snacks for PD.
2 mentions
Fingerprint cards — Fingerprint cards held two prints recovered from a glass front door after a prior trespass and later turned over to Investigator Jimenez. Jimenez testified that the cards were destroyed in August 2012 without his authorization.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 1301 — Government Exhibit 1301 was a stipulation identifying particular exhibits as data extracted from Kristina Khorram's cell phone. It was also used to identify the phone and its extracted data in connection with a displayed screenshot.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 4G-151 — Government Exhibit 4G-151 was a bank account statement for the 207 Anderson LLC account. Derek Ferguson identified the statement and discussed a $20,000 wire transfer to Casandra Ventura.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 629-A — Government Exhibit 629-A was a redacted exhibit the government sought to admit after George Kaplan's testimony. The defense objected on hearsay grounds, and the court deferred the dispute to allow further review.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 7R-141 — Government Exhibit 7R-141 was an InterContinental Hotel incident report prepared by a security officer at or near the March 5, 2016 incident. The report was admitted after testimony that such reports were regularly prepared as part of the officer's duties.
2 mentions
scrapbook — The scrapbook was described as a binder containing articles, highlighting, and other material assembled with considerable care. The court permitted the jury to review it briefly in the courtroom rather than retain it during deliberations.
2 mentions
1307 — Exhibit 1307 was admitted in full on Day 9, with the first four pages shown to the jury. The version in evidence was to include the redaction agreed upon by the parties.
1 mention
1407; 1407-R — Government Exhibits 1407 and 1407-R were confirmed as received in evidence on Day 33, with Exhibit 1407 under seal and Exhibit 1407-R publicly available in redacted form.
1 mention
1700-A; 1700-A-R — Defendant's Exhibit 1700-A was admitted under seal and Exhibit 1700-A-R was admitted publicly on Day 17. The underlying Exhibit 1700 scrapbook was permitted as a demonstrative.
1 mention
1701; 1701-R — Defendant's Exhibit 1701 was admitted under seal on Day 17, and the corresponding redacted Exhibit 1701-R was admitted publicly. The exhibits were part of defense social-media evidence involving Mia's posts and photographs.
1 mention
1702-1710; 1702-R-1710-R — Defendant's Exhibits 1702 through 1710 were admitted under seal on Day 17, and their corresponding redacted versions were admitted publicly. The exhibits were part of defense social-media evidence involving Mia's favorable public posts.
1 mention
1711-1719; 1711-R-1719-R — Defendant's Exhibits 1711 through 1719 were admitted under seal on Day 17, and their corresponding redacted versions were admitted publicly. The exhibits were part of defense social-media evidence involving Mia's posts and photographs.
1 mention
1720-1723; 1720-R-1723-R — Defendant's Exhibits 1720 through 1723 were social-media materials identified by Mia as accurate posts or content she created for her account. Each sealed exhibit and its redacted version was admitted during Mia's cross-examination on Day 17.
1 mention
2015 webinar presentation, “Expert Witness Testimony in Cases Involving Domestic Violence” — The 2015 webinar presentation was titled “Expert Witness Testimony in Cases Involving Domestic Violence.” Dr. Hughes testified that she gave the presentation and that the organization, rather than she, made it available as a webinar.
1 mention
3051, 3070, 3127-A, 3172 — Defendant's Exhibits 3051, 3070, 3127-A, and 3172 were admitted under seal without objection during Special Agent Joseph Cerciello's cross-examination on Day 32.
1 mention
331AR, BR, C, FR, HR, I and JR — Exhibits 331AR, BR, C, FR, HR, I, and JR are amended Jane notes. On Day 22, the Court authorized their admission at the appropriate juncture under Rules 803(3) or 801(d)(1)(B).
1 mention
331FR and 331HR — Exhibits 331FR and 331HR were the subject of a defense letter seeking to strike them under Rule 403. The court discussed the application on Day 23 and permitted further response and argument.
1 mention
332B, 332E and C334B — Exhibits 332B, 332E, and C334B are described as the June 1 exhibits and concern communications involving assistants. The Court concluded that the government had established the requirements for their admission and permitted introduction at the appropriate juncture.
1 mention
350-8021 — Exhibit 350-8021 consists of interview notes used during Bryana Bongolan's cross-examination. The defense compared interview materials and other accounts to test the chronology and wording of the balcony allegation.
1 mention
3508-004 — Exhibit 3508-004 is interview material shown to Bryana Bongolan during cross-examination to refresh her memory about whether she and Cassie attended parties.
1 mention
3512-004 — Exhibit 3512-004 is a police report shown to Scott Mescudi after he initially did not remember a prior account of Ms. Ventura's relationship history. After reviewing it, he said he remembered providing that information to law enforcement.
1 mention
3513-001 — Exhibit 3513-001 is a government interview record shown to Kerry Morgan during cross-examination. Morgan acknowledged telling the government she went to a hospital, while maintaining that she went to urgent care and did not remember saying hospital.
1 mention
3542.1 — Exhibit 3542.1 is a prior statement used during Sharay Dashawn Hayes's cross-examination after he denied having feelings for Cassie. Hayes said the attributed wording may have been taken out of context.
1 mention
3547.16 — Exhibit 3547.16 is a draft court submission shown to Dr. Hughes for input related to her testimony and a response to Dr. Bardey. The Court allowed general questioning about consultation on government filings but prohibited testimony or displays concerning the briefs themselves.
1 mention
3548-001 — Document 3548-001 was shown to David James during cross-examination for him to review an account attributed to his first government interview. James said he did not recall making the statement and called the notes inaccurate.
1 mention
3548-007 — Document 3548-007 was identified during David James's cross-examination as material from his second government interview. Counsel directed attention to pages 9 and 10 while questioning him about events outside the diner.
1 mention
3570 — Exhibit 3570 was used during Daniel Phillip's cross-examination concerning prior prosecutor interviews about directions from Combs and an alleged statement of jealousy toward Ventura. Phillip disputed one characterization and repeatedly said he did not recall making the alleged jealousy statement.
1 mention
3574 — Exhibit 3574 was displayed to Daniel Phillip after he said he did not recall a prior statement to law enforcement. The Court sustained an objection to reading from a document not in evidence and instructed counsel on refreshing recollection.
1 mention
3752-3 — Exhibit 3752-3 was shown to Dr. Hughes during cross-examination in connection with a question about an American Psychological Association policy. The Court required the defense to establish a basis before using the document for impeachment.
1 mention
3P-105, 3P-107, 3P-121, 3P-122 — Exhibits 3P-105, 3P-107, 3P-121, and 3P-122 are stipulated business records from Cowboys 4 Angels, the registered fictitious name of Collins Productions. The Court admitted them without objection during Special Agent Joseph Cerciello's cross-examination on Day 32.
1 mention
4H141; 4H130; 4H129; 4D-131 — Exhibits 4H141, 4H130, 4H129, and 4D-131 include CE Opco invoices and Sean Combs bank-account records. During Special Agent Joseph Cerciello's cross-examination, the defense paired invoice totals with bank transfers and elicited that a chart did not state that Combs personally paid the listed expenses.
1 mention
629(a) — Exhibit 629(a) is a text exchange discussed during a Day 13 evidentiary hearing. The court questioned whether sufficient context would establish its relevance and probative value and noted a risk of unfair prejudice.
1 mention
7B-101R — Exhibit 7B-101R is a Beverly Hills Hotel reservation record. On Day 18, it was used during cross-examination to confirm that a listed stay was under the name Phillip Pines.
1 mention
7R-141 — Exhibit 7R-141 is an incident report used during Israel Florez's cross-examination. Defense counsel compared the report with Florez's testimony about details, including his description of Cassie's eye, that were not recorded in it.
1 mention
941 — Exhibit 941 was displayed for Capricorn Clark to review during recross examination on Day 14.
1 mention
A-104-11A; A-104-11B; A-104-74A–A-104-74D — This group consists of Government Exhibits A-104-11A, A-104-11B, and A-104-74A through A-104-74D. The court admitted the public exhibits without objection on Day 27.
1 mention
A-104-13 through A-104-15, A-104-18, A-104-23, A-104-30, A-104-31, A-104-60, A-104-63 through A-104-73, A-104-76, A-104-78, A-301-K, A-301-R, A-442-19, A-442-31 and A-442-33 — This group consists of the listed Government Exhibits A-104, A-301, and A-442 records. The court admitted the exhibits under seal without objection on Day 22.
1 mention
A-629-A — A-629-A was an exhibit the government moved to admit after George Kaplan's testimony. The court did not admit it at that time and said the issue could be revisited at the break.
1 mention
B-315 email — B-315 was an email referenced by defense counsel during closing argument while discussing the evidence concerning the Porsche. Counsel said the email was a government exhibit and proposed to read it.
1 mention
B-346 — Exhibit B-346 is a text-message exhibit cited during defense closing argument. Counsel used part of the exchange in arguing that Cassie consented to the sexual activity at issue.
1 mention
B-629 and B-640 — Exhibits B-629 and B-640 are text-message materials discussed in a Rule 412 dispute on Day 7. The parties disagreed whether proposed additional messages concerned accusations of cheating or would require Rule 412 procedures.
1 mention
B-631 — Exhibit B-631 is a set of text messages discussed during defense closing argument as messages sent about five days after the InterContinental incident. Counsel cited the messages while arguing that drugs or alcohol contributed to what occurred.
1 mention
C-111 — Exhibit C-111 is a document displayed during Eddy Garcia's cross-examination. Defense counsel used it to review provisions allowing disclosures required by a court, governmental body, or law.
1 mention
Cassie's lawsuit — Cassie's lawsuit was discussed with Bryana Bongolan, who testified that she spoke with Cassie before the filing and asked that her name not be included. Bongolan later said she contacted Cassie because the complaint inaccurately stated that an event occurred at a hotel and that Tiffany was present.
1 mention
certain notes — Certain notes were shown to Bryana Bongolan during cross-examination. On redirect, Bongolan testified that she had not previously seen or reviewed the notes and did not know whether they were an exact transcript of the meetings.
1 mention
civil demand letter — The civil demand letter was discussed during Bryana Bongolan's cross-examination on Day 20.
1 mention
confidentiality agreement — The confidentiality agreement was discussed during closing argument on Day 36. Defense counsel argued that the agreement did not bar every disclosure and characterized related efforts as concerning publicity or civil litigation.
1 mention
court exhibit — The court exhibit was an immunity order that the court entered on Day 20.
1 mention
Court Exhibit 2 — Court Exhibit 2 is a juror's letter requesting a scheduling accommodation for Friday, June 20. The court entered it and directed the parties to review it for any issues.
1 mention
cover letter on the scrapbook — The cover letter accompanied a scrapbook and was addressed in a Day 16 evidentiary ruling. The court allowed the cover letter while limiting the scrapbook itself to courtroom demonstrative use rather than substantive evidence for the jury room.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1001-1428 — Defense Exhibit 1001-1428 is a group of listed defense records from devices Casandra Ventura provided to the government. The court admitted the records without objection beyond prior rulings on Day 33.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1500 — Defense Exhibit 1500 was shown to Dawn Richard during cross-examination to refresh her recollection about a letter describing an alleged egg incident.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1500 through 1519 — Defense Exhibits 1500 through 1519 are later communications involving Dawn Richard. The court ruled that the defense could use them to attempt to undermine her credibility by showing love and friendship rather than fear and intimidation.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1728 — Defense Exhibit 1728 is a text exchange between Mia and K.K. cited during defense closing argument after Mia was told she would be fired.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1733 — Defense Exhibit 1733 was admitted after the court overruled the government's objections on Day 17.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1748 dx 1794 — DX 1748 and DX 1794 were admitted after the defense sought admission of the full text chain, including statements about feeling betrayed and back-stabbed. The court described the proposed use as showing the speaker's state of mind.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1769 — Defense Exhibit 1769 was a multipage document shown to Mia during cross-examination on Day 18. After reviewing it, Mia said it did not refresh her memory about how much money was spent promoting Ms. Ventura's career compared with other artists.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1900 — Defense Exhibit 1900 consisted of Revolt organizational charts for July 2016 and was used during Derek Ferguson's cross-examination. The defense presented the companies as businesses with executives, departments, joint-venture partners, and finance procedures.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1901 — Defense Exhibit 1901 consisted of Combs Enterprises organizational charts used during Derek Ferguson's cross-examination. The defense presented the companies as businesses with executives, departments, joint-venture partners, and finance procedures.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1901-R — Defense Exhibit 1901-R was an organizational chart shown during Derek Ferguson's redirect examination. Ferguson testified that the chart identified Sean Combs as chairman.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 1901R — Defense Exhibit 1901R consisted of redacted Combs Enterprises organizational charts used during Derek Ferguson's cross-examination. The defense presented the companies as businesses with executives, departments, joint-venture partners, and finance procedures.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3003 — Defense Exhibit 3003 was a message between Jane and Ms. Khorram dated April 9, 2021. The Court admitted it under seal during Jane's Day 24 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3103 — Defense Exhibit 3103 was a March 25, 2023 message between Jane and Mr. Combs. The Court admitted the exhibit during Jane's Day 24 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3106-B — Defense Exhibit 3106-B was offered under seal after counsel corrected an erroneous exhibit number. The court admitted it under seal without objection.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3110 — Defense Exhibit 3110 was a message between Jane and Mr. Combs dated April 4, 2023. The Court admitted it under seal during Jane's Day 24 cross-examination.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3127 — Defense Exhibit 3127 was discussed during the defense's Rule 29 argument as containing an April 2023 entry about not letting KK know about an arrangement for a hotel night.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 400 and 401 — Defense Exhibits 400 and 401 were not offered because the parties agreed that they contained double hearsay. The parties stated that the exhibits could be used to refresh recollection or for impeachment.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 402 — Defense Exhibit 402 was a text exchange between Mr. Kaplan and Ms. Ventura. The court allowed the unobjected portions concerning Ms. Ventura's request for drugs in Boston and Mr. Kaplan's response, while identifying hearsay concerns with two other statements.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 652 dx 1875 — DX 652 was album art for Ms. Ventura's song "Love a Loser," and DX 1875 was a flyer for a business she had with Ms. Bongolan. The court excluded both exhibits under Rule 403 but allowed their use with the witness, including inquiry about writing on the flyer.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 930 and 938 — Defense Exhibits 930 and 938 were identified as exhibits raising Rule 412 issues. The government stated that the defense did not intend to show them to the witness or offer them.
1 mention
Defense Exhibits 1753R and 1753 (sealed) — Defense Exhibit 1753R was identified as a version of Mia's resume or curriculum vitae and admitted after no objection. Defense Exhibit 1753 was also received in evidence under seal.
1 mention
demand letter — The demand letter was examined during Bryana Bongolan's cross-examination. Bongolan agreed that wording attributing a balcony threat to Combs was untrue and said she dismissed the lawyer who sent the letter.
1 mention
demand letters — The demand letters were addressed during Bryana Bongolan's Day 21 redirect examination. Bongolan testified that she had not reviewed all of them before they were sent, later learned they were inaccurate, and fired her first lawyer.
1 mention
document from December 18, 2023 — The December 18, 2023 document was used during Daniel Phillip's cross-examination concerning a reported call with a female client before his first hotel visit. Phillip said he had not spoken with Cassie before that visit and that the agents' notes may not have reflected what he told them.
1 mention
E-331-AR; E-331-BR; E-331-C; E-331-FR; E-331-HR; A-104-59P; A-104-60P; A-104-61P; C-251; C-348-AR; C-348-BR; E-331-I; E-331-JR; A-104-59A; A-104-70A; A-104-72A; A-442-33; A-104-18 — This group of government exhibits was offered and admitted under seal pursuant to the court's pseudonym order on Day 27.
1 mention
E-331-N; E-331-O; E-331-K; E-3331-L; E-331-P — E-331-N, E-331-O, E-331-K, E-3331-L, and E-331-P were five Notes app entries written between November 2023 and March 2024. The government sought their admission as prior consistent statements, the defense objected, and the court reserved ruling.
1 mention
final jury charge — The final jury charge was discussed at the Day 34 charge conference. The court reviewed proposed objections and changes, stated that it would consider cited authorities on remaining issues, and said it would provide the final charge that evening.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1304 and Government Exhibits 4G110 through 4G192 and 4G131 — Government Exhibit 1304 and the listed 4G exhibits are Signature Bank business records offered under a stipulation between the parties. The court admitted the records after the defense stated it had no objection.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1410 — Government Exhibit 1410 was discussed during the defense's Rule 29 argument as containing messages involving Mia and D-Roc. Counsel referred to a message in which Mia said she missed D-Roc and another exchange concerning an offer after she said she was out of money.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 361c — Government Exhibit 361c was admitted and later addressed in the court's ruling on a mistrial motion. The court said the defense first used the document in cross-examining Ventura and could use it in challenging testimony concerning the balcony incident.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3A-117 — Government Exhibit 3A-117 is an email exchange between Casandra Ventura and Sean Combs. Ventura identified it as a true and accurate communication, and the court admitted it without objection.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3A-119-R — Government Exhibit 3A-119-R is an HR notice to Mia stating that she was suspended without pay for five days beginning March 25, 2011. Mia testified that HR told her the suspension was at Puff's direction, and the court directed further redaction of the document.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3T-107 — Government Exhibit 3T-107 was addressed in a Day 15 evidentiary ruling. The court found it admissible as an employee statement and stated that it was offered for the fact of the communication rather than for the truth of its contents.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3T-110 — Government Exhibit 3T-110 is an email that the court considered under the present-sense-impression rule. The court stated that the author was viewing events through cameras and that the email was provisionally excluded pending further foundation.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3T-112 — Government Exhibit 3T-112 was considered in a Day 15 evidentiary ruling. The court overruled the objection subject to an adequate foundation for admission under the agency rule.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3T-113 — Government Exhibit 3T-113 is Mia's passport. Mia recognized the passport during direct examination, and the court admitted it under seal.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 3T106R — Government Exhibit 3T106R was published during Mia's redirect examination. Mia testified that managing PD's social-media presence was part of her job.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 4G-131 — Government Exhibit 4G-131 is a Signature Bank application for a Combs Enterprises LLC business checking account. Derek Ferguson identified the account title and testified that both he and Sean Combs had signature authority over the account.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 4G-140 — Government Exhibit 4G-140 is a Signature Bank account-opening application. Derek Ferguson identified Sean Combs and himself as authorized signers on the account.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 4H-122 — Government Exhibit 4H-122 was used in Jane's direct testimony concerning rent support. Jane testified that Sean paid $10,000 in monthly rent and described how that support affected her sense of obligation.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 4H-141 — Government Exhibit 4H-141 is a Tri Star Sports & Entertainment Group record. The court admitted it under seal without objection during Joseph Cerciello's cross-examination.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7 R-141 — Government Exhibit 7 R-141 is an incident report discussed during the defense's Rule 29 argument. Counsel described the report as stating that no one was recording Combs, that guest safety and privacy were important to the hotel, and that attempting to record could result in removal from the property by police.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7B-101 and 7B-101-R — Government Exhibits 7B-101 and 7B-101-R are Beverly Hills Hotel records stipulated to be true and accurate, including a sealed exhibit and a redacted version. The court admitted them on Day 18.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7B-121 and 7B-139 — Government Exhibits 7B-121 and 7B-139 are hotel folios associated with stays listed under the Phillip Pines profile, including deep-cleaning and oil-damage charges. The court admitted both exhibits on Day 18.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7B-149 — Government Exhibit 7B-149 is an OPERA guest profile maintained by the Beverly Hills Hotel in the regular course of business. Testimony described how the system records both an alias and the actual guest's name.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7H-101 — Government Exhibit 7H-101 is a L'Ermitage Beverly Hills hotel record. Testimony described guest-profile notes concerning an alias, preregistered guests, room preparation, candle-wax damage, and a cleaning charge.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7H-102 — Government Exhibit 7H-102 is a L'Ermitage Beverly Hills hotel record concerning a profile's name history. Testimony described an activity log initially created under Sean Combs and later changed to other names.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7H-153 — Government Exhibit 7H-153 is a L'Ermitage Beverly Hills hotel record. The court admitted it with Government Exhibits 7H-101 and 7H-102 on Day 13.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7R-129 — Government Exhibit 7R-129 is an InterContinental New York Times Square hotel invoice dated October 5, 2012. Its final line item listed a $46,786 charge for petty cash and penthouse damage, paid through an American Express account ending in 3004.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7R-148 — Government Exhibit 7R-148 was an incident-report version containing added notes. On Day 5, the court excluded it after finding the notes were the writer's characterization of video evidence.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7R-149 — Government Exhibit 7R-149 is Garcia's March 5, 2016 email. It was used alongside shift records, surveillance footage, and signed documents during testimony about the video transfer and payment.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7Y-108 — Government Exhibit 7Y-108 was among selected records and communications used to confirm entries in government charts. The testimony described chart entries concerning travel, hotel stays, communications, and payments.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 7Y-111 — Government Exhibit 7Y-111 was admitted pursuant to a stipulation during Bryana Bongolan's cross-examination on Day 21. It was not published at that time.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 8B-101 — Government Exhibit 8B-101 is DMV vehicle-registration information for the license plate observed on a black Escalade. Officer Ignacio testified that the record listed Bad Boy Productions, Incorporation as the registered owner.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 8E-104 — Government Exhibit 8E-104 is an InterContinental Hotel employee sign-in sheet. Garcia testified that he entered the information near the time of his work and as a regular part of his security-officer duties.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A-104-4 — Government Exhibit A-104-4 concerns sexually explicit messages discussed during Jane's Day 22 direct testimony. Jane testified that she sent the messages to play into Sean's fantasy and did not actually want sex with other men.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A-104-59 — Government Exhibit A-104-59 is a September 2023 text discussed during Jane's Day 22 direct testimony. The government used it in follow-up questions about Jane's account that rent support contributed to her feeling obligated to perform hotel nights.
1 mention
Government Exhibit A-401-G — Government Exhibit A-401-G was identified as a text-message exchange during Casandra Ventura's direct testimony on Day 7.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-426 — Government Exhibit B-426 is a May 2017 exchange between Ventura and the defendant. The court sustained a Rule 403 objection to part of the message and required that portion to be redacted.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-622 — Government Exhibit B-622 is a January 26, 2016 text-message exchange between Ventura and Sean. Ventura testified that the message referred to ketamine used at some freak-offs.
1 mention
Government Exhibit B-626 — Government Exhibit B-626 is a text-message exchange between Ventura and Sean that Ventura identified as true and accurate. The court admitted the exhibit on Day 7 without objection.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-106 — Government Exhibit C-106 is Garcia's declaration concerning the video. Garcia testified that he signed the declaration without fully reading it and did not receive a copy.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-111 — Government Exhibit C-111 is a nondisclosure agreement signed by Garcia. Garcia testified that he did not fully read it or receive a copy, and the court later permitted its display during cross-examination.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-360-A — Government Exhibit C-360-A was admitted with two other government exhibits after Bryana Bongolan's recross on Day 21.
1 mention
Government Exhibit C-364-4A — Government Exhibit C-364-4A was admitted without objection on Day 10 alongside Government Exhibit C-364-4.
1 mention
Government Exhibit e 331 fr and hr — Government Exhibits E-331-FR and E-331-HR are substantially redacted notes. The court denied the defense motion to strike them after concluding they were admissible under Rules 803(3) or 801(d)(1)(B).
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-289 — Government Exhibit E-289 concerns rent support discussed during Jane's direct testimony. Jane testified that Sean paid $10,000 in monthly rent.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-331-B-R — Government Exhibit E-331-B-R was discussed during Jane's direct testimony in connection with the future use of Jane's notes. The court deferred that future-use issue for written submissions.
1 mention
Government Exhibit E-331-ER — Government Exhibit E-331-ER is a note Jane identified as having written during her relationship with Sean in November 2022. It was displayed during her Day 26 redirect testimony.
1 mention
Government Exhibit J-141-A — Government Exhibit J-141-A is the redacted version of J-141. The court withdrew prior versions and admitted the renewed redacted exhibit on Day 32.
1 mention
government interview notes — The government interview notes were used during Dawn Richard's cross-examination to compare prior interview accounts with her testimony. The questioning addressed details of an earlier incident, an alleged statement that people go missing, cocaine use, and payment to One Stop.
1 mention
marked exhibits — The marked exhibits were defense materials at issue in a Day 7 disclosure dispute. The court required disclosure before cross-examination, while allowing the government unrestricted use of disclosed exhibits and deferring final resolution of the broader issue.
1 mention
medical records concerning drugs and drug combinations prescribed to Mr. Combs — The medical records identified drugs and drug combinations prescribed to Combs. On Day 1, the court permitted limited testimony identifying the prescriptions and discussing the drugs and combinations, subject to stated restrictions.
1 mention
nondisclosure agreement — The nondisclosure agreement was discussed during Eddy Garcia's Day 19 redirect examination. Garcia read a provision requiring prompt written notice to the company before disclosure so the company could seek a protective order or otherwise prevent disclosure.
1 mention
Notes from Mia's meetings with the government — Notes from Mia's meetings with the government were shown to Mia during cross-examination concerning what she disclosed in early 2024 meetings with prosecutors. Mia said she did not remember the dates or each meeting's details, but said she did not disclose the alleged abuse at the first meeting.
1 mention
our handwritten proposal — The handwritten proposal was a defense submission concerning the court's response to a jury question about a drug-distribution instruction. The court rejected the proposal, proceeded with its stated response, and marked the proposal as a court exhibit.
1 mention
proposed immunity order dated today — The proposed immunity order dated that day was entered by the court on Day 29 and made a court exhibit after the witness said he intended to invoke the right against self-incrimination.
1 mention
proposed order of immunity — The proposed order of immunity was entered by the court on Day 27 and made a court exhibit after the witness said he intended to invoke the right against self-incrimination.
1 mention
recommendation letter — The recommendation letter was discussed during Capricorn Clark's Day 14 redirect testimony in connection with her expected letter and its 2012 settlement context. The court limited inquiry to that context and did not permit questioning about the settlement-payment amount.
1 mention
records from hotels, car services, and airlines — Hotel, car-service, and airline records were identified in the government's Day 5 opening as documents expected to show dates and locations of travel connected to freak-offs.
1 mention
reports and notes — Daniel Phillip testified on Day 6 that he had not seen, reviewed, or been asked to verify the reports and notes before the defense showed them to him on cross-examination.
1 mention
text messages and text threads — Text messages and text threads were discussed on Day 4 as potentially providing relationship context. The defense sought to introduce remaining portions of threads when selected messages were offered, while the government said the issues were message specific.
1 mention
the government's letter concerning the juror — The government's letter concerning a juror raised what the government described as an apparent lack of candor with the court. The defense requested time to respond in writing and objected to the juror's proposed removal; the court reserved decision pending that submission.
1 mention
training document — The training document concerned a presentation given by Dr. Hughes. On Day 12, the court found no basis to admit the document under Rule 403, while permitting questions about it and use to refresh the witness's recollection.
1 mention
two exhibit lists — The two exhibit lists were reviewed by both sides on Day 37 without objection before being provided to the jury.
1 mention
two letters from the jury — The two jury letters included a question about the jury charge's controlled-substances language and a scheduling notice. The court deferred a response to the substantive question until the following morning for party input.
1 mention
verdict form — The parties agreed to the verdict form at the Day 34 charge conference. The defense preserved its prior argument that certain predicate acts should not be included.
1 mention

Demonstratives (35)

Government Exhibit 1402 — Government Exhibit 1402 is a 23-page chart compiling cited hotel, flight, communications, and related records. The chart was reviewed for accuracy against materials supplied by the trial team, and testimony emphasized that it did not purport to be a complete collection of communications or people at a gathering.
6 mentions
Government Exhibit 1550 — Government Exhibit 1550 is a corrected timeline of events during March 2016, initially prepared by the trial team and reviewed by Special Agent DeLeassa Penland against cited evidence. On Day 29, the Court allowed the timeline to be used as a demonstrative.
3 mentions
Government Exhibit 1406 — Government Exhibit 1406 is a chart of selected records that Joseph Cerciello reviewed against corresponding government exhibits. During cross-examination on Days 32 and 33, he agreed that the chart did not document every meeting or message involving Jane and Combs.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 1407 — Government Exhibit 1407 is a chronological summary chart of selected messages and related records. Cerciello testified that the prosecution selected the materials and date ranges included in the chart, which was admitted on Day 32.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 1410-R — Government Exhibit 1410-R is a redacted chart that Sankar described as a fair and accurate summary of reviewed underlying exhibits. It distinguished texts from call records and used conversions from UTC to Eastern Standard Time; the court admitted the redacted chart on Day 28.
2 mentions
Government Exhibit 1411-R — Government Exhibit 1411-R is a 33-page redacted chart containing selected communications from an eight-year period. Sankar testified that attorneys selected the charted materials and that the chart did not include all messages from the period; the court admitted it on Day 28.
2 mentions
112 — Exhibit 112 was a compilation assembled from cell-phone videos already in evidence. The court allowed its use as a demonstrative during testimony on Day 18.
1 mention
113 — Exhibit 113 was a proposed video presentation that included red circles and zooming. The court excluded it on Day 18.
1 mention
B354Z, B233Z, B325Z, B361Z, B362Z, B626Z, B322Z, B327Z, B260Z, B218Z, and B217Z — The listed B-series exhibits were time-converted communications offered as aids while a summary chart was reviewed. The witness confirmed the accuracy of conversions from UTC to Eastern or Pacific time, and the defense did not object to their use as demonstratives.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 3330 — Defense Exhibit 3330 was a demonstrative listing defense exhibits offered on Day 31. The court admitted the listed exhibits under the terms stated by defense counsel, including the specified sealed treatment.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit 957 — Defense Exhibit 957 was admitted during Capricorn Clark's cross-examination. A related use of the exhibit identified it as a depiction of roadways around the 8925 Hollywood Hills Road residence.
1 mention
Defense Exhibit No. 957 — Defense Exhibit No. 957 depicts roadways around the 8925 Hollywood Hills Road residence. During Day 15 cross-examination, a witness familiar with the area agreed that it accurately depicted roads in the surrounding subdivisions.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1401 gx 1404 gx 1405 gx 1408 gx 1409 — Government Exhibits 1401, 1404, 1405, 1408, and 1409 were discussed as summary charts. On Day 14, the court stated that these charts appeared to be proper summaries under Rule 1006.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1402, 1406, 1407, and 1409 — Government Exhibits 1402, 1406, 1407, and 1409 are travel and financial summary charts concerning escorts. The government's closing argument referred to them alongside travel, hotel, and payment records.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1404 — Government Exhibit 1404 summarized financial records, including American Express charges and payments from corporate bank accounts. The court treated its final page as a proper summary and its first two pages as demonstratives.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1405 — Government Exhibit 1405 was a chart of selected American Express charges. On Day 17, the court directed a modification so the chart would identify the relevant underlying line items, and the parties agreed that the first and third slides would be treated as demonstratives.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1405-A — Government Exhibit 1405-A is a chart of selected expenses charged to an American Express account ending in 6009 that Penland reviewed for accuracy.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1405B — Government Exhibit 1405B is a chart of selected charges made on an American Express statement ending in 6009. Penland testified that the trial team selected the charges and that she reviewed the chart for accuracy.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1406, 1408 and 1409 — Government Exhibits 1406, 1408, and 1409 are charts that Cerciello compared with the government exhibits cited in them. He testified that the prosecution team chose the charts' information, and the Court admitted the three exhibits on Day 31.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1407R — Government Exhibit 1407R is the public redacted version of a chronological summary chart. On Day 32, the government offered it for public display and asked that Exhibit 1407 remain under seal.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1408 — Government Exhibit 1408 is a chart that included a September 2023 JetBlue airfare entry matching a CE Opco invoice amount. On cross-examination, Cerciello said he had not seen that invoice while preparing the chart.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1409 — Government Exhibit 1409 is a chart discussed alongside CE Opco invoices and bank-account transfers from Sean Combs that matched invoice totals. Defense counsel elicited that the chart did not state that he personally paid the listed expenses.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1410 and 1411 — Government Exhibits 1410 and 1411 are summary charts that remained subject to review for potential hearsay issues during a Day 24 procedural discussion.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1410 and gx 1411 — Government Exhibits 1410 and 1411 are summary exhibits that include text-message content and a small number of image files or screenshots. The Court reviewed the exhibits as summaries of voluminous writings and directed further discussion of specific objections.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1503 — Government Exhibit 1503 is a document listing three groups of government exhibits offered before a witness's testimony. The Court admitted the listed exhibits on the stated bases without defense objection.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1505 — Government Exhibit 1505 is a demonstrative listing exhibits the government offered on Day 27. The Court admitted the listed exhibits on the bases specified by the government.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1507 — Government Exhibit 1507 is a demonstrative list of exhibits the government offered on Day 28, including certain exhibits designated as sealed. The Court admitted those exhibits under the stated terms.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1508 — Government Exhibit 1508 is a demonstrative listing exhibits the government offered before calling its next witness on Day 31. The Court admitted the listed exhibits, including sealed items under the pseudonym order.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1511 — Government Exhibit 1511 is a demonstrative listing government exhibits, some designated as sealed under a court pseudonym order. The Court admitted the listed exhibits on Day 31.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1551-1555 — Government Exhibits 1551 through 1555 are demonstratives offered alongside financial chart exhibits on Day 28. The Court admitted the chart exhibits and permitted the demonstratives to be used as aids.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1553 — Government Exhibit 1553 is a demonstrative showing charges on a Sean Combs American Express statement ending December 24, 2009, and a total amount due of $369,279. Its second page shows that a Signature Bank account ending in 9686 paid that amount.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 1B-101 — Government Exhibit 1B-101 is a Google map view of Star Island and the surrounding area. Special Agent Gannon testified that he used the map during the briefing to show where Star Island was, and the court admitted it on Day 11.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2C-101 — Government Exhibit 2C-101 is a demonstrative exhibit used with Capricorn Clark's account, a route map, photographs, and an email to develop the December 2011 sequence involving Mescudi and Ventura.
1 mention
Government Exhibit 2C-103 — Government Exhibit 2C-103 is a map depicting the distance between Casandra Ventura's apartment at 875 Comstock and Sean Combs's house at 200 South Mapleton. Ventura identified the map as a true and accurate depiction of that distance during her Day 6 direct testimony.
1 mention
opening-statement demonstratives — The parties reported on Day 4 that neither side would use demonstratives in opening statements.
1 mention

Testimony References (8)

Cruz's oral statement to victim 1 — Cruz's oral statement to victim 1 was proposed through witness testimony as a statement made while Cruz was working for Bad Boy Records and managing victim 1's career. The court overruled the defense objection after the parties addressed whether the statement concerned the scope of Cruz's employment.
1 mention
David James's anticipated testimony about the Mel's Diner incident — David James's anticipated testimony concerned an incident at Mel's Diner involving a confrontation with Suge Knight and a subsequent search for him. The defense sought exclusion as irrelevant and prejudicial, while the government said James would describe events he personally observed; the court overruled the objection.
1 mention
Dawn Richard's anticipated testimony about threats after an alleged assault on Ms. Ventura — Dawn Richard's anticipated testimony concerned alleged threats after witnesses saw an alleged assault on Ms. Ventura. The court deferred the remaining relevance and undue-prejudice objection for a later decision.
1 mention
June 2024 evidence concerning Jane's bruises and injuries — June 2024 evidence concerning Jane's bruises and injuries was described by the court as visible evidence from one of the government's examples of violence against Jane. The court stated that the incident occurred after searches of Combs's residences and was one of the alleged Mann Act violations on which he was convicted.
1 mention
prior inconsistent statements — Prior inconsistent statements referred to statements by government witnesses that defense counsel said differed from their testimony. The parties were working toward a stipulation concerning instances for which counsel said a proper foundation had been laid.
1 mention
Proposed testimony and bank records concerning a $20,000 payment — The proposed testimony and bank records concerned a demand for $20,000, a loan and transfer made by Ms. Ventura's mother, and bank records for an account in the name of 207 Anderson. The court reserved a final admissibility decision until the government laid a foundation for the testimony.
1 mention
Proposed testimony from Mr. James concerning the chef incident — Proposed testimony from Mr. James concerned an alleged incident involving force against a chef. The court permitted the testimony subject to an appropriate foundation and allowed the defense to object if the foundation was not laid.
1 mention
Proposed testimony from Ms. Morgan about Ms. Ventura's statement — Proposed testimony from Ms. Morgan concerned Ms. Ventura's statement that she had to go to a hotel. The court excluded the testimony after concluding that Ms. Ventura was not available to be recalled and the relevant disclosure came after her cross-examination.
1 mention

Stipulations (8)

Other (7)