Skip to content
personpersonArun SubramanianArun SubramanianUnited States district judge for the Southern District of New York.← All People
JudgeUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Arun Subramanian

United States district judge for the Southern District of New York.

7,434 lines·330 proceedings

About

Arun Subramanian presided from jury impanelment through the verdict and immediate post-verdict proceedings. Before openings, he instructed jurors to decide the case impartially from admitted evidence, avoid outside information, and hold the government to its burden of proving each element beyond a reasonable doubt, with no obligation on the defendant to present a defense.

Throughout testimony, Subramanian ruled on admissibility, examination limits, expert evidence, and protections for sensitive witnesses. His decisions included excluding challenged text-message content under Rule 412 while allowing narrower relationship questioning, denying the motion to strike Dr. Hughes's testimony, and setting privacy measures for Mia and Jane. He also managed juror issues, removing Juror No. 7 after finding material inconsistencies in residence statements and later excusing Juror No. 6 and substituting an alternate.

At the Day 34 charge conference, Subramanian resolved disputes over the final instructions, added statutory language to the forced-labor definition, and removed one obstruction predicate. During closing arguments, he instructed jurors not to consider prosecutors' charging decisions or the government's decisions to investigate and indict. On Day 37, he instructed the jury on the five counts, the presumption of innocence, reasonable doubt, witness credibility, deliberations, and the verdict sheet.

During deliberations, Subramanian answered juror concerns without seeking details of the jury's discussions and directed continued deliberation after the jury reported verdicts on four counts but not Count One. On Day 39, the jury acquitted Combs of racketeering conspiracy and both sex-trafficking counts and convicted him on two transportation counts. Subramanian then denied post-verdict bail and directed the parties to work with probation on an expedited sentencing schedule.

Trial Record (330)

Federal2025 Federal TrialMay 5, 2025 – Jul 2, 2025

Arun Subramanian presided over the trial, setting evidentiary and privacy boundaries, managing juror issues, and delivering the final instructions. He directed continued deliberations after a partial-verdict note, received the jury's acquittals on racketeering conspiracy and both sex-trafficking counts and convictions on two transportation counts, then denied post-verdict bail.

Jury Selection Day 1

Jury Selection Day 2

Jury Selection Day 4

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

Day 9

Day 10

Day 11

Day 12

sidebarMotion to Strike Hughes Testimony3lines spoken

Summary

The defense sought to strike Dr. Hughes's direct testimony as exceeding the disclosure and improperly bolstering Ms. Ventura; the government defended its scope, and the court reserved decision pending cross-examination.

Day 13

Day 14

Day 15

Day 16

Day 17

Day 18

Day 19

Day 20

Day 21

Day 22

Day 23

Day 24

Day 25

Day 26

Day 27

Day 28

Day 29

Day 30

Day 31

Day 32

ProceduralVerdict Form Conference and Trial Schedule1highlight25lines spoken

Summary

The court considered the racketeering-conspiracy verdict form and adopted an agreed schedule leading to a Wednesday charge conference and Thursday summations.

Highlights (1)

Quote“I don't think it's going to be feasible to have the jury write in the racketeering acts without -- I think that's a recipe for disaster.”— Arun SubramanianThe court explained its concern with an open-ended verdict form for the racketeering-conspiracy count.Open in transcript →

Day 33

ProceduralDefense Case by Stipulation10lines spoken

Summary

The defense presented sexual and affectionate messages and stipulations about earlier witness statements and report omissions, then rested; the government declined rebuttal, and closings were scheduled for Thursday.

Day 34

Charge ConferenceCharge Conference on Final Jury Instructions1highlight290lines spoken

Summary

The court resolved extensive final-instruction disputes, removed one obstruction predicate, revised several charge provisions, and set the closing-argument schedule.

Highlights (1)

Quote“It has to be that the person has attained the services of that person by those means.”— Arun SubramanianThe court identified omitted statutory language it would add to the forced-labor instruction.Open in transcript →

Day 35

Day 36

Day 37

Day 38

Day 39