Skip to content
personpersonMarc A. AgnifiloMarc A. AgnifiloAttorney who represented Sean Combs in the federal criminal case.← All People
DefenseAgnifilo Intrater LLP

Marc A. Agnifilo

Attorney who represented Sean Combs in the federal criminal case.

3,996 lines·124 proceedings·1 mention

About

Marc A. Agnifilo represented Sean Combs as defense trial counsel, conducting witness examinations and addressing recurring evidentiary disputes. He argued that proposed cross-examination should depend on the testimony opened at trial, resisted advance disclosure requirements beyond Rule 16 while agreeing to practical production, and pressed for context in text-message evidence. The court required disclosure of relevant marked exhibits before Ventura's cross-examination and excluded challenged text content under Rule 412 while permitting other relationship questioning and possible redactions.

Agnifilo's mapped cross-examinations developed several distinct evidentiary themes. With Kerry Morgan and David James, he tested recollections, prior accounts, financial arrangements, and workplace conduct. With George Kaplan and Capricorn Clark, he pressed details of their employment relationships, observations, and records bearing on disputed events. His questioning of Lance Jimenez addressed partial female DNA, an uncollected glove, and gaps in the Porsche-fire investigation; questions to Derek Ferguson developed company financial controls and the limits of the CFO's observations; and his cross-examination of Andre LaMon focused on the location, accessibility, and original placement of recovered firearms.

In closing, Agnifilo argued that admitted domestic violence did not itself prove racketeering, sex trafficking, forced labor, drug distribution, or coercion, and he urged the jury to evaluate the relationships, workplace evidence, and recorded events against the elements of the charges. After prosecutors objected that parts of the defense summation invited speculation about charging decisions, the defense maintained that the remarks were fair argument and objected to an immediate instruction. The court ruled that charging decisions were outside the jury's consideration and gave a curative instruction.

Trial Record (124)

Federal2025 Federal TrialMay 5, 2025 – Jul 2, 2025

Marc A. Agnifilo served as defense trial counsel, conducting cross-examinations that tested witness accounts, corporate-control evidence, and gaps in fire and search investigations. In closing, he argued that admitted domestic violence did not establish the charged racketeering, trafficking, or related offenses; the court later gave a curative instruction after a dispute over his comments about charging decisions.

Jury Selection Day 1

Jury Selection Day 4

ProceduralVictim 1 Cross-Examination Admissibility Argument1highlight14lines spoken

Summary

The court deferred ruling on proposed cross-examination of victim number 1 about prior incidents, invited further briefing, and resolved the parties' agreement on specified InterContinental Hotel videos.

Highlights (1)

Quote“I see this as a wholesale relevant matter that becomes far more relevant based on how they handle her direct and what she testifies to.”— Marc A. AgnifiloDefense counsel argued that the proposed cross-examination could be independently relevant, not merely impeachment.Open in transcript →

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

Day 9

Day 10

Day 11

Day 12

Day 13

Day 14

Day 15

Day 16

Day 17

Day 18

Day 19

Day 20

Day 21

Day 22

Day 23

Day 25

Day 26

Day 27

Day 28

Day 29

Day 30

Day 31

Day 32

Day 33

Day 35

Day 36

ClosingDefense closing argument resumedMarc A. Agnifilo1highlight37lines spoken

Summary

The defense disputed the forced-labor, drug-distribution, and sex-trafficking theories and argued that the InterContinental video showed a phone-related domestic-violence incident, not sex trafficking.

Highlights (1)

Quote“This was a fight about a phone.”— Marc A. AgnifiloThe defense's concise interpretation of the InterContinental video while disputing its relevance to the sex-trafficking allegations.Open in transcript →
ClosingDefense closing argument resumedMarc A. Agnifilo1highlight16lines spoken

Summary

The defense completed its summation by disputing coercion, prostitution, racketeering, and the reliability of the government’s proof, then requested acquittal on all counts.

Highlights (1)

Quote“There is no way on God's green earth Sean Combs is going to release one of these videos.”— Marc A. AgnifiloDefense counsel used this categorical assertion to dispute the alleged video-release threats.Open in transcript →

Day 37

Day 38

Day 39