Skip to content
personpersonNicole WestmorelandNicole WestmorelandAttorney who represented Sean Combs in the federal criminal case.← All People
Defense· Defense

Nicole Westmoreland

Attorney who represented Sean Combs in the federal criminal case.

1,486 lines·21 proceedings

About

Nicole Westmoreland represented Sean Combs and cross-examined prosecution witnesses Dawn Richard and Bryana Bongolan during the trial.

On Day 10, Westmoreland questioned Richard about her pending civil lawsuit, prior government interviews, and alleged differences between those accounts and her trial testimony. Richard maintained that she had tried to give her best recollection of the frying-pan incident and an alleged statement by Combs, while acknowledging changed or different accounts concerning cocaine use and what she observed involving One Stop. Westmoreland also conducted Richard's recross.

During a sidebar on the scope of redirect, the court said the defense had not yet laid a foundation to introduce a text-message exhibit for impeachment, but permitted further questioning to try to do so. Westmoreland later cross-examined Bongolan over Day 20 and Day 21 and conducted recross.

Key Points

Attorney insights (3)

2025 Federal Trial21
Focus

Cross-examined Dawn Richard and conducted recross, questioning prior accounts, civil-litigation interests, government interviews, and alleged differences from trial testimony. [1][2]

Focus

Cross-examined Bryana Bongolan across Day 20 and Day 21, then conducted recross. [1][2][3]

Credibility challenge

Westmoreland challenged Dawn Richard's account through questions about her pending civil lawsuit, prior government interviews, and alleged differences between those accounts and her testimony. [1]

Trial Record (21)

Trial 12025 Federal TrialMay 5, 2025 – Jul 2, 2025

Nicole Westmoreland represented Sean Combs and cross-examined Dawn Richard and Bryana Bongolan. Her Day 10 questioning of Richard addressed prior accounts, litigation interests, and impeachment foundation issues.

Day 10

sidebarRedirect Scope on Lawsuit Reasons1highlight9lines spoken

Summary

The sidebar addressed the permissible scope of redirect after cross-examination challenged the witness's credibility and motives for communicating with and suing the defendant.

Highlights (1)

Quote“I don't think Ms. Westmoreland has opened the door to all the forced labor allegations.”— Arun SubramanianThe court limited the scope of the government's proposed redirect.Open in transcript →

Day 20

Day 21