Skip to content
personpersonJaneJanePseudonymous former partner of Sean Combs.← All People
Witness

Jane

Pseudonymous former partner of Sean Combs.

7,840 lines·61 proceedings·36 mentions

About

Jane testified on direct examination from Day 21 through Day 23 about her romantic relationship with Sean Combs and recurring hotel nights involving male entertainers. She described helping contact entertainers, arranging travel and payments, taking drugs, and asking about condom use. Through messages, notes, and recordings, she said the encounters came to dominate the relationship and that Combs's rent payments and other support contributed to her feeling obligated to participate.

She also described travel to New York and Miami, carrying packages she later said contained ecstasy, and a June 2024 confrontation at her home. Jane acknowledged that she pushed Combs's head into a counter, threw objects, and later punched him. She testified that Combs then kicked open doors, choked, punched, kicked, dragged, and slapped her, and afterward directed her to take ecstasy and engage sexually with Antoine while she tried to conceal her injuries.

During cross-examination on Days 24 through 26, defense counsel used affectionate messages, photographs, travel, gifts, financial support, and Jane's own role in choosing or contacting entertainers to challenge her account of coercion. Jane acknowledged loving communications, benefits, some planning, and continued contact with Combs, including after Casandra Ventura's lawsuit. She maintained that she often acted because she loved him and wanted his approval, while also saying that pressure, resentment, unequal treatment, and fear of losing the relationship or housing shaped her choices.

On redirect, Jane repeated that rent support and anticipated conflict made her feel pressured to accept hotel nights, and she described asking to sit out one encounter because she was unwell. Recross examined whether she had communicated reluctance directly, the financial support she received, her recollection of earlier events, and the June 2024 encounter. In the final redirect, she testified that Combs had slapped and punched her before directing her to let Antoine into the home.

Trial Record (61)

Federal2025 Federal TrialMay 5, 2025 โ€“ Jul 2, 2025Called by prosecution

Jane testified for the prosecution about her relationship with Sean Combs, recurring hotel encounters with male entertainers, and the pressure she said came from affection, financial support, drugs, and fear of conflict. Cross-examination focused on affectionate messages, her role in arranging encounters, continued contact, and the June 2024 confrontation, while she maintained that love and dependence coexisted with reluctance and resentment.

Day 5

Day 7

Day 19

ProceduralJane Testimony Privacy MeasuresMentioned

Summary

The court set privacy measures for Jane's testimony, preserved a video-compilation dispute, clarified two defense exhibits' admission, and granted same-day courtroom access for defense review.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 21

Day 22

Day 23

DirectJane โ€” DirectJaneMaurene R. Comey5highlights1,286lines spoken

Summary

Jane testified through messages, notes, recordings, and later events about hotel nights, rent, alleged tape threats, and her relationship with Sean from 2023 into 2024.

Highlights (5)

testimony highlightJane read September 2023 messages and notes in which she said she did not want to be used or locked in a room to perform and described feeling obligated after Sean began paying for her home.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightJane described traveling to New York expecting time alone with Sean, then said his messages while she was on the flight led her to understand he wanted a hotel night. She testified that Kabrale was later brought to the Trump Hotel and that cash from Sean was left for him in an envelope.Open in transcript →
Quoteโ€œIt's been three years of me having to fuck strangers. I'm tired.โ€— JaneJane read this as a message she sent during the October 2023 argument about hotel nights.Open in transcript →
Quoteโ€œI'm still trying to figure that out.โ€— JaneJane gave this qualified answer when asked whether her statement that she was consenting was true.Open in transcript →
Show all 5 highlights
evidence eventThe Court admitted two recordings of November 19 calls. Jane testified that she did not know either conversation was being recorded and identified the calls as conversations with Sean.Open in transcript →

Day 24

ProceduralMistrial and Evidentiary Motions RulingsMentioned

Summary

The court denied the mistrial and evidentiary motions, declined to recall Dr. Hughes, and received defense preservation requests concerning alleged false testimony, a juror, and later Rule 29 issues.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossJane โ€” CrossJaneTeny R. Geragos4highlights467lines spoken

Summary

Jane's cross-examination examined her relationship with Combs, government preparation, alleged pressure, financial support, and defense exhibits.

Highlights (4)

testimony highlightJane acknowledged approximately 24 meetings with prosecutors and agents, said she was prepared for cross-examination about twice, and confirmed that she received immunity before grand-jury testimony.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightJane agreed that she loved Combs and valued their relationship but said emotional manipulation and pressure shaped her participation in the hotel nights.Open in transcript →
Quoteโ€œYes, I resented the way that he went about introducing me to this lifestyle was built under a lot of emotional manipulation and pressure. Yes, I do resent that about our relationship very much.โ€— JaneJane distinguished her feelings for Combs from her account of pressure surrounding the hotel nights.Open in transcript →
Quoteโ€œThere were some times that I definitely felt that he would do that. And he used it kind of as a, as a little tool. The rent was always just like a reminder.โ€— JaneJane described how she understood rent payments within the relationship.Open in transcript →

Day 25

CrossJane โ€” CrossJaneTeny R. Geragos3highlights907lines spoken

Summary

Jane acknowledged affectionate messages and some hotel-night planning, while maintaining that pressure and emotional dependence shaped her participation.

Highlights (3)

testimony highlightJane testified that she sometimes suggested or organized hotel-night arrangements, while describing those actions as adaptations to pressure she felt in the relationship.Open in transcript →
Quoteโ€œMy circumstances were my options in this relationship was what I had to adjust to, which was if I see him, there is a request for a hotel night, so I'm just adapting to my circumstances, I'm adapting to my environment. So there are moments where I suggest and organize things under the pressures of my lover, yes.โ€— JaneJane distinguished her acknowledged role in suggesting or organizing some arrangements from her account of pressure within the relationship.Open in transcript →
Quoteโ€œI resent him for knowing how much I loved him and knowing I couldn't say no to him.โ€— JaneJane directly stated her view of why she participated in the sobriety-party hotel night.Open in transcript →

Day 26

CrossJane โ€” CrossJaneTeny R. Geragos2highlights898lines spoken

Summary

Jane's cross-examination examined the June 2024 confrontation, alleged coercion involving Antoine, continued relationship contact, and contested evidentiary issues.

Highlights (2)

Quoteโ€œHe kicks me on the back of the leg, and then I fell on my buttocks and then I was lifted up in a choke hold.โ€— JaneJane gave a concise account of part of the June 2024 confrontation that the defense examined in detail.Open in transcript →
Quoteโ€œWe were in the bathroom and he's in my face telling me to take a pill, yes.โ€— JaneJane described the circumstances she said preceded oral sex involving Antoine after the June confrontation.Open in transcript →

Day 27

Day 28

Day 31

Day 32

Day 33

Day 34

Day 35

Day 36

Day 37

Day 39

VerdictVerdict Return and Jury DischargeMentioned

Summary

The jury unanimously acquitted Sean Combs of racketeering conspiracy and both sex-trafficking counts, while convicting him on two Mann Act transportation counts.

Mentioned in this proceeding.